Pa. attorney general’s office delays release of email probe findings |

Pa. attorney general’s office delays release of email probe findings

Aaron Aupperlee

Too many redacted emails have delayed Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s office from releasing a report about pornographic and offensive emails sent by local and state officials through her office’s servers.

Solicitor General Bruce L. Castor, Kane’s second in command, canceled a news conference scheduled for Tuesday during which the office planned to present the findings.

“Castor determined the working draft report was not comprehensive, and that too many of the emails provided in support of the working draft report were redacted,” stated a news release the Attorney General’s Office issued Monday.

The statement did not identify who had redacted the emails or why. Calls and emails to the Attorney General’s Office were not returned.

A news conference to present the findings will be scheduled for the summer, according to the release.

The scandal involving off-color and vile emails, dubbed “Porngate,” figures prominently in Kane’s defense as she heads to trial in August on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Kane claims an “old boys network,” threatened by the emails becoming public, set her up and orchestrated charges against her.

Kane’s law license has been suspended, and she is not seeking re-election this fall.

Kane hired Douglas Gansler, a former Maryland attorney general, to investigate the emails at a cost that could hit $2 million. Gansler and BuckleySandler LLP, his law firm, could not finish the report in time, forcing Castor to reschedule.

“(Castor) erroneously believed the full, un-redacted and comprehensive report he had asked to be finished by the end of May would be ready in time,” the release stated.

Gansler’s report could disclose new names and email chains or show whether Kane’s twin, Ellen Granahan, received more emails than those Kane released in December. Gansler has said the investigation likely won’t result in criminal charges, but he wanted to make all the material public.

Associated Press contributed to this report.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.