Archive

ShareThis Page
Pa. Liquor Control Board finance director’s tenure ends | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Pa. Liquor Control Board finance director’s tenure ends

Tribune-Review
| Monday, November 10, 2014 6:15 p.m.
gtrLCBfinance111114
August Hehemann was director of finance for the Liquor Control Board

The state Liquor Control Board confirmed Monday that it no longer has a director of finance, but would not say whether August Hehemann was fired or resigned.

Spokeswoman Stacy Kriedeman confirmed that Hehemann’s tenure ended at the close of business Friday. He was hired Aug. 3, 2009, and earned $118,827 annually.

“As for the reason, we don’t discuss personnel matters,” Kriedeman said.

Hehemann oversaw the departments of real estate, office of information technology systems, financial operations, and purchasing and contracting, according to his biography on the LCB’s website, which was removed Monday.

He also was in charge of budgeting and forecasting for the agency that operates more than 600 wine and spirits stores statewide.

In a July 30 memo to LCB board members, a copy of which was obtained by the Tribune-Review, Hehemann suggested raising the LCB’s markup on products from 30 percent to 35 percent to cover a projected drop in net income from $120.7 million to $96.2 million for the 2014-15 fiscal year.

LCB officials have since said that price increase is not being considered.

Hehemann previously worked as treasurer, controller and chief financial officer in various industries and was an audit manager with a public accounting firm for nine years.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.