Pa. praises fight against blight in Northumberland County |

Pa. praises fight against blight in Northumberland County

SUNBURY — Northumberland County is the poster child for the state Department of Community and Economic Development when it comes to fighting blight in the state.

At the Northumberland County Blight Summit on Thursday morning at the county administration building, DCED officials praised the county and the municipalities that have been working together in an effort to combat blight.

“I feel like a proud parent,” said Beverly Hutzel, manager for the Keystone Communities Program at DCED’s Center For Community Enhancement. “I commend everyone involved. There’s been a great effort and a great success.”

DCED’s Keystone Communities was a pilot program, and Hutzel said she is “anxious and eager” to take Northumberland County’s example across the state.

Kerry Kirkland, central region director, said the “cooperation and effectiveness” the county and municipalities have is not something often seen in state programs.

“It’s remarkable,” Kirkland said. “My only desire is how we can strategize to get you more funding.”

The first county blight summit was held in 2011, and the Blighted Property Task Force was formed by the county commissioners in early 2012. To date, nearly $1.8 million from the Neighborhood Assistance Program, Keystone Communities, Act 137, HOME, Federal Home Loan Bank and local matches has been used to demolish 37 properties in Sunbury, Mount Carmel, Mount Carmel Township, Coal Township and Shamokin and rehabilitate two properties across the county.

State Rep. Lynda Schlegel Culver, R-108, said she has noticed the changes in Sunbury.

“We used to get calls for years for bugs, rats and smells,” Culver said. “In the last year, not one call. You can point out which neighborhood have improved.”

Putting more “tools in the toolbox” is making a difference, she said.

The top prevention strategies include encouraging municipalities to enact comprehensive property maintenance codes and to take advantage of state laws that prohibit “bad actors” from purchasing properties at tax sales, developing a county-wide warning system, and improving communications with the district judges to gain support in dealing with blighted properties. The top remediation strategies include implementing the laws, using Community Development Block Grant funding, ticketing for code violations as a summary offense, and encouraging district attorneys to charge repeat offenders with misdemeanor charges.

Sunbury City Clerk Cheryl Delsite said the city’s redevelopment authority has been successful and printing of addresses has been working, while Mount Carmel Township officials said they have found a lot of success with posting bright orange signs on doors of people with code violations. Coal Township officials said their ticketing efforts have been working.

The goal has been to “stop the bleeding,” Northumberland County Housing Authority Director Ed Christiano said.

The task force will be setting up a Northumberland County Land Bank, the practice of aggregating parcels of land for future sale or development, for Shamokin, Sunbury, Coal Township, Mount Carmel and Mount Carmel Township. The first meeting will be held this month or in July.

“I know at some point, we’re going to need this,” Housing Authority employee Pat Mack said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.