Pennsylvania budget planners say end in sight |

Pennsylvania budget planners say end in sight

HARRISBURG — In the sixth month of a state budget stalemate, lawmakers may make a final push this weekend to agree on the details of historic education funding, expanding the sales tax base, reforming public pensions and making wine and liquor more readily available.

The plan to increase state spending by 6 percent is far from finalized. There’s a “framework” of an agreement, but questions remain on the tax increase. Some Republicans question the robustness of liquor and pension proposals.

Several session days are scheduled next week.

Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre County, when asked how much is agreed to, said: “Ninety percent, but that last 10 percent is the bumpiest.”

“We have to be close,” said Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf. “We worked through the past weekend. We need a budget soon.”

Wolf told reporters there’s not “any sticking point” but rather a need to work out details and language.

“It looks like the problem is how they come up with the revenue,” said G. Terry Madonna, a political science professor at Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster.

Though House and Senate Republican leaders ruled out a “broad-based tax increase,” budget negotiators worked out a way to help raise up to $600 million without increasing the 6 percent sales tax. A recent plan to raise the rate to 7.25 percent — 8.25 percent in Allegheny County — fell flat.

Instead, the current proposal would extend the list of services and items subject to the tax. Under discussion: admission to nonprofits such as museums, symphonies and businesses such as bowling alleys, amusement parks, golf courses, ski slopes and campgrounds.

Dry cleaners and other “personal services” such as gym trainers have been discussed for taxation, but it’s not clear whether they’re still included.

Affected groups are lobbying legislators not to include them in the tax base.

“I hope the Legislature will understand the detrimental impact that this will have on hard-working Pennsylvania families,” said Rob Fulton, president of the Pennsylvania Association of Travel and Tourism.

The Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council sent emails warning about the “detrimental impact” on a sector of the economy.

“We’re concerned about the possibility that, as part of the solution to the budget impasse, that sales tax will be applied to nonprofit organizations that are of arts and culture in nature,” said Mitch Swain, executive director of the Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council. “That means performing arts, museums, historical sites, things like that.”

Reflecting the fluid nature of the talks, Swain added: “Truthfully, at this moment, we’ve been told we’re not on the list. But we’re warning our members that could change at any moment, and it’s important that we ask our elected officials to be cognizant of the difficulties that this could cause.”

Part of the problem is that “people equate sales tax increases with property tax relief,” said Rep. Tom Quigley, R-Montgomery County.

Lawmakers couldn’t reach agreement with Wolf on reducing property tax, so that could not be included.

“I just don’t see how it is a good step forward,” Quigley said. The liquor privatization and pension reform proposals “don’t seem robust enough” to warrant giving up a tax vote, he said.

“I’m not going to vote for a tax increase,” said Rep. Rick Saccone, a Republican who represents parts of Allegheny and Washington counties. He’d like to see a beefed-up pension reform proposal.

The pension proposal under consideration would be a “hybrid” plan, combining a portion of state pensions under a guaranteed formula and the rest in a 401(k)-type plan.

One liquor plan under discussion allows beer distributors to sell wine and liquor if they buy expanded licenses. Grocery stores with “R” licenses could sell wine and beer. But that falls short of the sale of state stores that House Republicans have sought.

“I don’t think there is a deal for liquor,” said Wendell W. Young IV, president of United Food and Commercial Workers 1776, which represents state store clerks.

Liquor law changes have been counted on for $200 million toward the budget framework.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or [email protected]. Staff writer Natasha Lindstrom contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.