ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania Democrats increase midterm leads in new poll |

Pennsylvania Democrats increase midterm leads in new poll


Momentum is building behind Pennsylvania Democrats in the run-up to the Nov. 6 election, and the party’s candidates for the two highest-profile offices are widening their leads, according to new polling from Franklin & Marshall College.

Gov. Tom Wolf led Republican challenger Scott Wagner among likely voters, 52 percent to 30 percent, and about 17 percent were undecided, according to a poll released Thursday.

U.S. Sen. Bob Casey led Republican challenger Rep. Lou Barletta, 50 percent to 33 percent, with 15 percent undecided, the results showed.

The two candidates grew their leads in the college’s poll from August, when Wolf led by 17 percentage points and Casey did by 13 percentage points.

The poll surveyed 545 registered voters, including 256 Democrats and 213 Republicans – numbers that reflect party registration in the state. The poll surveyed “likely voters,” factoring in enthusiasm and other factors to predict Democrats will turn out in higher numbers than Republicans. The margin of error was 6.1 percentage points.

The results for the gubernatorial and Senate race were in line with a recent Muhlenberg College/Morning Call poll .

Many voters in both parties said their opinions of President Donald Trump are driving their votes for congressional candidates. Seventy-four percent of those voting for a Democrat said their vote is primarily a vote against Trump, while 80 percent of those who plan to vote Republican said their vote is meant to support Trump.

About 37 percent said Trump is doing an “excellent” or “good” job while half reported that level of approval for Wolf.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.