Pennsylvania Gov.-elect Wolf to inherit shortfall of $1.85B |

Pennsylvania Gov.-elect Wolf to inherit shortfall of $1.85B

HARRISBURG — Democratic Gov.-elect Tom Wolf steps into office in January confronted with the same problem that Republican Gov. Tom Corbett had in 2011: a multibillion-dollar deficit left by his predecessor.

The Independent Fiscal Office on Thursday projected a $1.85 billion budget shortfall for 2015. That’s “bad news for Pennsylvania, but the depth of the financial hole left by the Corbett administration is still not known,” Wolf said in a statement.

There would be no looming fiscal issue if lawmakers had enacted Corbett’s proposals for new revenue and savings — selling the state liquor stores and reforming the public pension system, said Jay Pagni, Corbett’s spokesman.

Corbett “inherited a $4.2 billion deficit” and pushed through four budgets with fiscal discipline and no tax increase, he said.

“I am disturbed but not surprised to learn that Pennsylvania has a growing budget deficit, estimated by the Independent Fiscal Office as being nearly $2 billion,” said Sen. Vincent Hughes of Philadelphia, ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee. “This is a direct result of the irresponsible fiscal policies pursued by the Corbett administration.”

Corbett in 2010 campaigned on fiscal austerity. He inherited a huge deficit, his budget office said, from former Gov. Ed Rendell, a Philadelphia Democrat. Much of it stemmed from the loss of federal stimulus money that Rendell used to prop up state spending. Republicans blamed excessive spending by Democrats.

“As bad as today’s news is, what lies ahead could be worse,” Wolf said.

Wolf urged the parties to work together, saying he’ll need cooperation since Republicans control the House and Senate, and therefore two-thirds of any solution.

The 2014-15 budget included $619 million in one-time savings and $332 million in shifted funding, which exacerbated the structural imbalance next year, the fiscal office said. Slow erosion of the tax base and “normal” growth in expenditures drove much of that imbalance, the report said.

With a growing population of senior citizens, average incomes shrink and government costs increase, said Steve Miskin, House Republican spokesman.

Missed opportunities include privatizing the state stores, which would have yielded more than $1 billion, Miskin said.

The House approved a liquor reform plan that died in the Senate.

Wolf opposes selling the state stores.

“Mr. Hughes and his colleagues refused to even discuss the issue of pension reform,” Miskin added.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.