Pennsylvania high court rejects appeal by former state Rep. DeWeese |

Pennsylvania high court rejects appeal by former state Rep. DeWeese

The Associated Press

HARRISBURG — Former state Rep. Bill DeWeese has lost another round in his bid for a new trial on corruption charges.

The state Supreme Court refused on Tuesday to consider DeWeese’s appeal of a ruling against him by a three-judge Superior Court panel in August.

DeWeese, 63, is serving at least 2½ years in Retreat State Prison in northeastern Pennsylvania for using public employees and taxpayer resources for political purposes.

The lower court said the trial record showed that DeWeese stole taxpayer-provided services worth more than $100,000 and rejected his claim that the trial judge abused his discretion at sentencing.

The lion’s share of the money was attributed to a former aide who handled DeWeese’s political fundraising and testified against him under a grant of immunity from prosecutors.

DeWeese represented his southwestern Pennsylvania district for 35 years, serving much of his tenure in Democratic leadership, including a two-year stint as House speaker.

Barring any misconduct, DeWeese would be eligible for parole on March 28, Susan Bensinger, a spokeswoman for the state Corrections Department, said Wednesday.

DeWeese was the only sitting legislator to stand trial among the 25 Democrats and Republicans connected to the House of Representatives who were arrested in a sweeping state corruption probe. Most of the defendants were convicted.

His attorney did not return a call seeking comment on Wednesday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.