ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania House lawmaker Lowery Brown convicted of taking cash bribes |

Pennsylvania House lawmaker Lowery Brown convicted of taking cash bribes

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, October 31, 2018 6:30 p.m

HARRISBURG — A Pennsylvania state lawmaker faces the possibility of prison time after a jury on Wednesday convicted her of charges she accepted $4,000 in cash from an undercover informant seven years ago.

A Harrisburg jury found Philadelphia Democratic Rep. Vanessa Lowery Brown guilty of bribery, five counts of conflict of interest and failing to properly file a financial disclosure form.

“We’re disappointed in the outcome,” said Lowery Brown’s lawyer, Pat Casey. “We will continue to fight on her behalf, and it is a classic case of government overreach.”

Casey said he expected to appeal.

The trial pitted prosecutors who argued she took the money in exchange for official favors against Lowery Brown’s defense team, which argued she had been entrapped into taking the money.

Lowery Brown is unopposed in seeking a sixth term in next week’s election. She declined to say what her plans are for her seat.

Prosecutor Mike Sprow said although he was uncertain about the details, if she is sentenced before the new session begins in December, it may affect her ability to qualify for lifetime health benefits and her pension. Sentencing was scheduled for Nov. 28.

A spokeswoman for the State Employees’ Retirement System said she was unsure why the Dec. 1 date would be significant, but that after Lowery Brown is sentenced, her case will be reviewed to see if it qualifies for pension forfeiture under state law .

The verdict, Sprow said, is “obviously what we believed was appropriate in this case. I think the jurors saw through the entrapment defense.”

House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Cheswick, said Lowery Brown must relinquish her seat in the House no later than the day she is sentenced. A special election to fill the seat would then be scheduled by the House speaker.

“She waged a long legal battle and mounted a defense against the charges, but the verdict rendered today means she must face the consequences,” Dermody said.

Sprow said the sentencing range on six of the seven counts is up to nine months, so it is possible Lowery Brown may get state prison time.

Lowery Brown told a grand jury in 2014 she knew taking the money was wrong. She had previously agreed to plead guilty in the case but changed her mind.

The verdict follows guilty or no contest pleas by four other onetime Philadelphia state lawmakers and a former traffic judge in the city, all Democrats, for taking cash or gifts from informant Tyron Ali. The other three then-sitting lawmakers resigned as part of their pleas.

The cases were brought by prosecutors in Philadelphia and Harrisburg after then-state Attorney General Kathleen Kane abandoned the investigation in 2013 when she concluded it improperly targeted black officials. Philadelphia’s then-district attorney, Seth Williams, revived the case.

Williams, Lowery Brown and the other five defendants are all black; Kane is white.

Kane and Williams, both Democrats, were subsequently convicted of criminal offenses related to their offices. Williams is in federal prison, while Kane is on bail while she is pursuing appeals.

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.