Pennsylvania law blocks public from seeing who is buying their voter registration information |

Pennsylvania law blocks public from seeing who is buying their voter registration information

The Pennsylvania State Capitol in Harrisburg.

State law allows anyone with valid ID to obtain your voter registration information but blocks you from finding out who’s looking.

That’s the upshot of an Office of Open Records decision involving a Quincy Township supervisor and Franklin County.

“I think you should be allowed to find out who’s looking at it,” said Kerry Bumbaugh. “It’s a stupid law.”

He filed a right-to-know request to find out who had received copies of the county’s registered voter list during the 2017 calendar year. The county denied the request citing a state law that, in fact, blocks it from providing that information.

The law governing voter registration lists requires counties and the Department of State to verify the identity and keep a record of who looks or copies the lists and enter their information into a form.

“This form will not be available for public inspection or copying,” the law says.

Bumbaugh found a way around this by asking for the receipts the county gave people and entities who bought the voter list. As a political candidate, he knew that he had to report any spending including the purchase of a voter list, and that his campaign finance records are public.

The Office of Open Records agreed that the receipts are financial records and aren’t covered by the law blocking public access to the form.

The law allowing people to buy copies of the list prohibits the release of some of the information including the voter’s signature, driver’s license number and the last four digits of the voter’s Social Security number.

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1218, [email protected] or via Twitter @TribBrian.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.