ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania looks to set ground rules for legalized sports betting |
U.S./World Sports

Pennsylvania looks to set ground rules for legalized sports betting

Associated Press
Super Bowl proposition bets are displayed on a board at a Las Vegas sports book. Nevada imposes a 6.75 percent state tax on gaming revenues, compared with Pennsylvania’s proposed 36 percent.
John Gurzinski | Las Vegas Review-Journal
Super Bowl betting lines between the Steelers and Packers are displayed at the race and sports book at the Palms on Thursday, Feb. 3, 2011, in Las Vegas.
John Locher/AP
The Supreme Court has struck down a federal law that bars gambling on football, basketball, baseball and other sports in most states, giving states the go-ahead to legalize betting on sports.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
Buildings stand near the shore in this aerial photograph taken over Atlantic City, N.J., in August 2014. By law, all of New Jersey's eight operating casinos are in Atlantic City.
Burned-out lights can be seen as a woman passes Trump Plaza Hotel & Casino on The Boardwalk on Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2014, in Atlantic City, N.J. Legalizing sports gambling could be a lifeline to New Jersey's floundering casino industry, state Sen. Ray Lesniak said.
While many still visit sports books to place bets, there are approximately 200 online sports books outside the United States where people can place bets — an illegal procedure that has yet to garner legal action against bettors.

Even before the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way Monday for states to allow sports gambling, Pennsylvania lawmakers prepared the state to regulate and tax it.

Included in a 2017 Pennsylvania gambling expansion law was an authorization for sports wagering as soon as a federal court ruling allowed the state to regulate such bets.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down the 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, which — with some exceptions — barred all states except Nevada from authorizing sports betting.

“The legaliza­tion of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court’s majority opinion. “Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each state is free to act on its own.”

Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board spokesman Doug Harbach said the board is reviewing the court’s opinion and could not provide an estimate for when sports betting might become legal in the state. He said sports wagering was a “key element” of legislation last year that helped plug a state budget hole by allowing gambling in airports, truck stops and on the internet.

The bill also allowed as many as 10 satellite gaming sites in the state. One is slated for Westmore­land County.

The bill paved the way, but the gaming board still has to write regulations, including the types of bets that could be placed for each sport.

“Theoretically, it’s already approved. There’s just no regulations in place,” said state Rep. George Dunbar, R-Penn Township, who has advocated for expanded gambling.

The Legislature could still pass more rules, Dunbar said, such as a proposal that would require sports betting operations to have a physical location in Pennsylvania. That would prevent existing, legally gray betting web ites from snapping up all the new gaming in the state, Dunbar said.

The Supreme Court’s decision takes something that is already happening illegally and lets states like Pennsylvania make it legal, he said.

The American Gaming Association estimates Americans in 2016 illegally wagered $154 billion on sports, mostly through bookies and offshore websites. The AGA estimated Americans would illegally wager nearly $10 billion on the NCAA’s March Madness alone this year.

“We understand that sports gambling is going on,” Dunbar said. “We just want to get our share.”

Regional reaction

“We’re very pleased with the decision of the Supreme Court and think it’s been quite a while in the making,” said Troy Stremming, a spokesman for Pinnacle Entertainment, the parent company of Meadows Casino & Racetrack in Washington County.

Stremming said the company has been preparing for the decision, but he said Pennsylvania’s relatively high tax on gaming revenue — 34 percent — could give the company pause as it considers where to launch sports betting.

He said the biggest benefit from sports betting would come from bringing new customers into the casino, who might try slots or table games along with sports betting. He said sports betting areas in the company’s casinos would likely resemble sports bars with the option to play other games.

Greg Carlin, CEO of Rivers Casino’s parent company, said the company has been “eagerly awaiting and preparing” for the court’s ruling.

“It’s exciting news for the consumer, the industry and the states,” Carlin said in a statement. “In addition to providing sports enthusiasts with a better, safer environment, today’s Supreme Court decision will redirect revenue previously lost to the black market and instead generate much needed tax revenue at state and local levels. We look forward to adding sports betting across all our gaming platforms as soon as possible.”

Officials with the Penguins declined to comment.

The Steelers declined to comment until the team and the NFL conduct a thorough legal review of the decision.

“There are still far too many unknowns for us to be in a position to comment on the specifics of the matter,” said Brian Warecki, the Pirates vice president of communications and broadcasting. “We echo the sentiment of the Major League Baseball Commissioner’s Office in that our most important priority must be protecting the integrity of the game.”

Dunbar said he believes sports betting could be integrated into Pennsylvania’s future online gambling platform. “We can set it up in a manner that our existing casinos can get the first shot at it through licensing.”

Penn State officials also said they will watch as Pennsylvania establishes regulations for legal sports betting.

“As the largest (football bowl series) intercollegiate athletics program in Pennsylvania, we will be monitoring this issue and its process closely, and will actively engage when necessary to see that the interests of the university and its student-athletes are represented appropriately,” Jeff Nelson, Penn State associate athletic director, said in a statement.

Wes Venteicher and Matthew Santoni are Tribune-Review staff writers. Trib Sports writers Jerry DiPaola, Chris Adamski and the Associated Press contributed to this report. Reach Venteicher at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher. Reach Santoni at 724 836 6660, [email protected] or on Twitter @msantoni.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.