ShareThis Page
Philipsburg loses its showcase hotel suddenly |

Philipsburg loses its showcase hotel suddenly

| Saturday, December 1, 2012 3:58 p.m.

PHILIPSBURG, Pa. — What a difference a year makes.

A year ago, the Philips Hotel was putting up a beautiful Christmas tree, decking the historic building’s halls and festooning the lobby with swags and lights, preparing to welcome children to sit on Santa’s lap after the annual Philipsburg Christmas parade.

This year, the hotel is locked and dark. The phone doesn’t ring, and owner Faith Lucchesi’s contact number is not accepting calls. The website reports a generic “internal server error.”

A note taped to the front door reads: “If you are reading this sign, you were a friend of The Philips and for that we are forever grateful. We have met many wonderful people who have touched our lives in many surprising ways. People who we will never forget and whose memories we will cherish. Sadly, however, the restaurant is now closed for business. Be well, and thanks for the memories.”

It’s a blow for the building some saw as a great opportunity for development in the community.

Almost 100 years old, the Philips originally was a hotel with a fancy restaurant, a coffee shop and a tobacco shop, catering to the business clientele who took trains to Philipsburg to network in the coal, brick or lumber industries. As those fell away, it was reborn as an assisted living facility, Moshannon Heights, operated by Presbyterian Senior Living (now Windy Hill Village). But that too went away a number of years ago when the home was closed and residents relocated. The building stood empty, awaiting new life.

In 2009, it seemed that time had come. Centre County commissioners and state officials announced that new owners were stepping up, matching a $1 million grant secured for Philipsburg development in the wake of the 2005 fire that struck the downtown with $1.3 million of their own funds. Improvements would bring the building into compliance to reopen as a hotel, restaurant and public event space, going for things like Americans with Disabilities Act upgrades, sprinkler systems, room restoration and work on the stairwells.

It reopened, and for a couple of years, it seemed great. The ballroom buzzed with parties and banquets. A rooftop dining space gave patrons a view. But not everyone was thrilled. Online reviews exposed recent weaknesses.

“The Philips is a very old hotel which has, by all appearances, not received much in the way of upgrades from its owners, whom I assume are looking for a way to make a quick buck by charging exorbitant prices for a miserable experience,” said one TripAdvisor user who stayed at the hotel in October.

Philipsburg Main Street Manager Dana Shoemaker was one of the first to be surprised by the locked doors, when she showed up for two back-to-back meetings and couldn’t open the front door. That was just one day after she had been there with a bus full of diners from a Leadership Centre County trip. She said there was no indication it was closing then.

“Clearly, it’s a tragedy for us,” she said. “We don’t have any other lodging.”

That’s something that can make it harder for the Philipsburg area to justify receiving tourism dollars since the county collects them based on a pillow tax levied on hotels. The two other local hotels are on the other side of the creek, in Clearfield County.

“It was bringing in a fair amount of business from out of town,” Shoemaker said. “It’s just sad. It’s very rare to have reuse of a white elephant structure.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.