Prosecutors to judge: Send Bill Cosby to prison for 10 years |

Prosecutors to judge: Send Bill Cosby to prison for 10 years

Bill Cosby arrives for his sentencing hearing at the Montgomery County Courthouse, Monday, Sept. 24, 2018, in Norristown, Pa.
Bill Cosby arrives for his sentencing hearing at the Montgomery County Courthouse, Monday, Sept. 24, 2018, in Norristown, Pa.
Bill Cosby arrives for his sentencing hearing at the Montgomery County Courthouse, Monday, Sept. 24, 2018, in Norristown, Pa.
Former model Janice Dickinson arrives at the sentencing hearing for Bill Cosby at the Montgomery County courthouse in Norristown, Pa., on Monday, Sept. 24, 2018.
Activist Bird Milliken pushes a shopping cart with a likeness of Bill Cosby before he arrived for his sentencing hearing as she demonstrates outside the Montgomery County Courthouse on Monday, Sept. 24, 2018, in Norristown, Pa.
Andrea Constand arrives at the sentencing hearing for the sexual assault trial of Bill Cosby at the Montgomery County Courthouse in Norristown, Pa., Monday, Sept. 24, 2018. Cosby was the first celebrity to go to trial in the #MeToo era and could be the first to go to prison — perhaps for the rest of his days — after being convicted in April of violating Temple University employee Constand at his suburban Philadelphia home in 2004.

NORRISTOWN — Prosecutors asked a Montgomery County judge Monday to send Bill Cosby to prison for 10 years, arguing that he has shown no remorse for using his celebrity status to befriend and sexually assault Andrea Constand.

Cosby’s own lawyers, however, asked the judge to show mercy on the 81-year-old entertainer, arguing that he should not serve a prison term because he poses no danger to the public.

Judge Steven T. O’Neill is expected to make his decision Tuesday, determining if Cosby will spend perhaps the rest of his life behind bars or return home to the Cheltenham estate where he has been on house arrest since a jury convicted him in April.

Cosby will be sentenced on one count of aggravated indecent assault; lawyers agreed to merge the three counts into one, making District Attorney Kevin Steele’s sentencing request the maximum penalty that the judge could give.

“This is about a person who put himself in a situation of being a mentor but we know that he had other intentions right from the beginning,” Steele said of Cosby, who met ant offered to mentor Constand when she was a Temple University employee.

The lawyers’ arguments capped off the first day of what is expected to be a two-day proceeding in Norristown. O’Neill also listened to statements from Constand and her family, and earlier heard a psychologist assert that Cosby should be designated as a “sexually violent predator” in part because he has a personality disorder that makes him inclined to engage in sex with non-consenting women.

Pennsylvania law gives great latitude to judges to determine a sentence, but state guidelines suggest a term of 22 months to three years in prison for Cosby.

State sentencing data show that two years ago, about 80 percent of defendants who, like Cosby, were convicted of aggravated indecent assault but had no prior record received a state prison sentence.

Cosby, wearing a dark suit, sat quietly between his lawyers and leaned forward in his seat, appearing to pay close attention to the proceedings. His wife, Camille, who has voiced support for her husband since his conviction, did not attend. Defense lawyers called no character witnesses to testify on Cosby’s behalf.

Joseph Green, one of Cosby’s lawyers, urged O’Neill to avoid influence from the court of public opinion when considering a just sentence. He spoke of Cosby’s childhood in North Philadelphia, and about his career as a comedian in which he sought to unite people of different races. Now, he said, Cosby is simply a frail old man.

“Mr. Cosby is not dangerous,” Green said. “Eighty-one-year-old blind men who are not self-sufficient are not dangerous.”

Several of Cosby’s accusers showed up for the hearing, greeting each other with hugs. Andrea Constand, the former Temple University employee whom he was convicted of drugging and assaulting, sat in court with her sister and parents. Three women who testified at Cosby’s trial this year — Chelan Lasha, Lise Lotte Lublin and Janice Dickinson — sat behind Constand.

During her brief statement to the judge Monday afternoon, Constand reminded him of her testimony during both his trials, and referenced her victim impact statement.

“The jury heard me. Mr. Cosby heard me,” she said. “And now all I am asking for is justice as the court sees fit.”

Earlier, a psychologist who evaluated Cosby told the judge that she classified his behavior as predatory, and said he was likely to re-offend.

Psychologist Kristen F. Dudley, a member of the Pennsylvania Sex Offender Assessment Board, said Cosby declined to let her interview him, so she instead reviewed “boxes of documents,” including all police reports in the case and the transcripts of both of Cosby’s trials, to complete her evaluation.

She noted Cosby “repeatedly engaged in grooming and sexual offending behavior with young adult females,” and said for individuals with a sexual disorder like his, “behavior is demonstrated to be beyond their control — they are inclined, urged, to act upon this.”

The defense lawyer, Green, questioned whether Cosby was likely to commit more crimes. “There’s no reasonable prospect than an 81-year-old blind man is likely to reoffend,” he said.

Dudley disagreed. “Just because it hasn’t happened yet doesn’t mean it won’t happen,” she said.

Cosby’s lawyers had argued that the sexually violent predator hearing should not be held because the state law regarding sex offender registration is unconstitutional.

But O’Neill proceeded with the hearing. If he rules that Cosby is a sexually violent predator, the entertainer will be required to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life and attend monthly counseling.

O’Neill said he will make that ruling Tuesday, after hearing testimony from an expert offered by defense lawyers.

And then, he is expected to announce his sentence.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.