PSU chief to review Freeh report on Sandusky scandal |

PSU chief to review Freeh report on Sandusky scandal

The Associated Press
Eric Barron answers questions from the media, Monday, Feb. 17, 2014, in State College, Pa. Barron was elected Monday to replace current Penn State President Rodney Erickson, who will retire this summer. (AP Photo/Centre Daily Times, Nabil K. Mark) MANDATORY CREDIT; MAGS OUT.

STATE COLLEGE — The president of Penn State University says he will review the Freeh report, a document regarding the school’s response to the Jerry Sandusky molestation scandal that has divided the university and its alumni since it was issued more than two years ago.

President Eric Barron vowed Saturday in a statement on the university’s website that he would conduct “a thorough review” of the report and supporting materials.

“The contents of the report have led to questions by some in the Penn State community. I do not want people to believe that Penn State is hiding something. I feel strongly about this,” he said.

“For this important reason, and since I was not here during its completion, I will conduct my own review,” Barron said, vowing “all deliberate speed,” although there was “considerable documentation to analyze.”

The report produced for the university in 2012 by a team led by former FBI Director Louis Freeh concluded that high-ranking university leaders concealed key facts about Sandusky’s abuse of children to avoid bad publicity. It included more than 100 recommendations for change that have been adopted by the university: from governance to child safety.

What has rankled many were the criticisms of former head football coach Joe Paterno, who died a few months after Sandusky’s arrest in 2011, as well as then-President Graham Spanier, former Athletic Director Tim Curley and former Vice President Gary Schultz.

Spanier, Curley and Schultz are charged criminally with covering up complaints about Sandusky, a retired defensive football coach. He was convicted in June 2012 of 45 counts of sexual abuse involving 10 children, including incidents on campus. He was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in state prison. The former administrators await trial in county court in Harrisburg. A trial date has not been scheduled.

Freeh’s report was issued shortly before a consent decree between Penn State and the NCAA resulted in a four-year bowl ban, a $60 million fine and a temporary loss of football scholarships. The NCAA recently ended the bowl ban earlier than scheduled and said Penn State can return to its full complement of scholarships next season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.