Push to nix Pennsylvania statute of limitations to follow church sex abuse report |

Push to nix Pennsylvania statute of limitations to follow church sex abuse report

The Associated Press
Associated Press
Pennsylvania state Rep. Mark Rozzi, D-Berks, speaks during a March 2016 child sex abuse statute of limitations rally attended by advocates, legislators and victims in the rotunda of the state Capitol in Harrisburg.

HARRISBURG — A renewed push for legislation to abolish Pennsylvania’s statute of limitations in sex abuse cases will follow the publication of a sweeping grand jury report on allegations of child sexual abuse and cover-ups within six Roman Catholic dioceses around the state, a lawmaker said Tuesday.

Rep. Mark Rozzi, D-Berks, said he will be prepared to seek a vote in the state House of Representatives on legislation that carries provisions sought by victims.

The House two years ago overwhelmingly approved Rozzi’s legislation to lift time limits for authorities to pursue charges of child sexual abuse and for those onetime child victims to sue their attackers and institutions that covered it up. Rozzi’s bill also would have established a two-year window for victims to sue for damages if they are now older than the current legal age limit.

Currently, state law bars onetime child victims from suing for damages if they have turned 30 and bars authorities from filing criminal charges if the person making the claim of child sexual abuse has turned 50.

The Senate, however, rejected key provisions, including the two-year window. Rozzi, who has told of his rape as a 13-year-old boy by a Roman Catholic priest, said he is hoping the grand jury’s report changes enough minds for his bill to pass the Senate this time.

“My instinct was if we really want to get what we need here, the public policy that we believe is best for victims, we have to wait for this report to come out and that’s going to give us that leverage to not only move this bill through the House, but to put enough pressure” on Senate leaders, Rozzi said.

Attorney General Josh Shapiro could release results of the two-year investigation this month. Victim advocates say it will be the biggest and most exhaustive ever by a state.

Rep. Pat Harkins, D-Erie, said he has spoken to victims who were among the dozens who testified before the grand jury.

“As a practicing Catholic, I’m prepared to hear the worst and, believe me, I know some of what’s coming, just from the Erie diocese, and it’s sickening,” Harkins told a rally crowd organized by Rozzi on Tuesday. “What you’re going to hear is going to rock your faith. You’re going to say to yourself, ‘how can I be a part of this?’ And I anticipate a number of church pews being empty after this. … To think that this was allowed to go on and ruin people’s lives is unconscionable.”

In an 11-page opinion last week, the supervising grand jury judge rejected a challenge by unidentified parties to releasing the report, and said it will carry recommendations to change state laws.

Previously released grand jury reports from investigations into the other two Pennsylvania dioceses — Philadelphia and Altoona-Johnstown — have advocated lifting the statutes of limitations and allowing a two-year window for victims to sue for damages.

The Pennsylvania Catholic Conference and the Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, which represents for-profit insurers, have opposed allowing a two-year window.

Other states have taken such a step, although some state senators say they believe it to be unconstitutional in Pennsylvania. Advocates say they believe it is constitutional and that courts should be the judge.

The Senate most recently voted last year to eliminate the statute of limitations in criminal prosecutions. The bill also would remove any time limit for a future victim or a victim who is not yet 30 to sue the perpetrator, a co-conspirator or someone who knew of the abuse but failed to report it to authorities.

The Senate bill, however, would not entirely do away with time limits for a victim to sue an institution, such as a church or a school. It caps the victim’s age at 50.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.