ShareThis Page
Remains of 3 black Civil War vets to be moved to historic cemetery |

Remains of 3 black Civil War vets to be moved to historic cemetery

The Associated Press
| Friday, November 11, 2016 1:36 p.m

FORT INDIANTOWN GAP — The remains of three African-American veterans of the Civil War will be moved next week from overgrown graves to the cemetery at central Pennsylvania’s Fort Indiantown Gap.

A pair of public ceremonies on Wednesday will mark the transfer of the bodies of William Anderson, Greenburg Stanton and John Nelson from Huntsdale, Pa., to the national cemetery about 50 miles away, reported Friday.

Anderson was a corporal in the renowned 54th Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry that was featured in the movie “Glory.”

Stanton was a private in the Massachusetts cavalry. Details of Nelson’s service record aren’t known.

The three were buried in a cemetery that was later moved about a half-mile away, but their remains were left behind and their graves became overgrown with trees, shrubs and brush.

Christopher Hoffman of Hoffman Funeral Home and Crematory said their old cemetery is now private property. The owner contacted local government officials about the graves several years ago, and in 2009 a group of Boy Scouts cleared much of the trees, shrubs and brush from the cemetery.

But some people thought more should be done, so they had the men exhumed and their remains placed in new caskets.

“It is a privilege to assist in recognizing these Civil War veterans for their service to our country and give them a permanent place of remembrance,” Hoffman told

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.