Archive

Rick Saccone concedes Pennsylvania U.S. House race to Conor Lamb | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Rick Saccone concedes Pennsylvania U.S. House race to Conor Lamb

Natasha Lindstrom
gtrsaccone539031418
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Republican candidate Rick Saccone speaks to supporters at an election night party Tuesday, March 13, 2018, at the Youghiogheny Country Club.
ptrelectionday005031418
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Congressional candidate Rick Saccone casts his ballot at Mount Vernon Presbyterian Church in Elizabeth Township, during the special election for Congress in the 18th District, on Tuesday, March 13, 2018.
ptrtrumpsaccone03031118
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
President Trump speaks to the crowd gathered for a rally for Republican congressional candidate Rick Saccone at Pittsburgh International Airport on March 10, 2018.

Rick Saccone officially conceded Wednesday night in his nationally watched 18th Congressional District bid against Democrat Conor Lamb.

Saccone, a Trump-backed Republican from Elizabeth, phoned Lamb about 6:30 p.m., Saccone campaign spokesman Bob Branstetter told the Tribune-Review.

“He congratulated him and wished him luck,” Branstetter said.

Unofficial tallies show Saccone, 60, trailing Lamb, 33, of Mt. Lebanon, by about 700 votes. Results have yet to be certified by election officials in the district’s Allegheny, Westmoreland, Washington and Greene counties.

Lamb declared victory on the night of the special election held eight days before.

Trump effectively conceded for Saccone on Tuesday night at a GOP fundraising event in Washington, D.C.

The Saccone campaign still has concerns, however, over allegations raised by the National Congressional Republican Committee over alleged voting machine errors and potential violations of elections code rules during the March 13 special election.

The NRCC — which pumped more than $3 million into efforts to defeat Lamb — threatened to file a lawsuit, alleging “irregularities” such as glitches in electronic voting machines and problems with voters finding polling places. Elections officials have adamantly disputed the claims.

When asked if the Saccone campaign remains concerned over the special election’s integrity and transparency, Branstetter said, “Absolutely.”

But he added that “it’s up to the NRCC” to decide whether to pursue legal recourse.

When pressed whether claims being raised could have influence the outcome of the election, Branstetter said he was “unsure.”

Saccone now will press forward in a second campaign to represent Pennsylvania’s newly drawn 14th Congressional District, which spans all of Fayette, Greene and Washington counties and portions of Westmoreland County.

Related: Rick Saccone’s campaign confirms bid for newly drawn 14th Congressional District

The new 14th District favored President Trump in the 2016 election by about 20 percentage points.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.