Students who visited Ebola-stricken areas are healthy, Penn State says |

Students who visited Ebola-stricken areas are healthy, Penn State says

About 80 Penn State University students who traveled to Ebola-stricken areas before the school year began are considered healthy, university officials said Saturday.

School officials had asked the students to self-monitor for signs of infection, including fever, vomiting and diarrhea, according to university spokeswoman Lisa Powers, and none has reported being ill. Ebola infection usually appears between eight and 10 days after exposure but can take as long as to 21 days to appear, federal health officials said.

“Everyone has indicated they are healthy,” Powers said. “Classes have been in session since late August.”

The first person to be diagnosed with Ebola in the United States, Liberian national Thomas E. Duncan, has been downgraded to critical condition in Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has not released treatment information for Duncan, saying only that experimental options are available.

Nine people were in close contact with Duncan and are being monitored, CDC Director Tom Frieden said, and four of them are friends and family Duncan was visiting in Dallas. The others apparently are health care and emergency workers. As many 40 other people had some contact with Duncan and are being monitored.

More than 100 people have been interviewed about their level of contact with Duncan, who fell ill and went to the Presbyterian Hospital’s emergency room on Sept. 26, before being mistakenly released. He returned on Sept. 28, and a blood test confirmed the presence of Ebola a day later.

Megha Satyanarayana is a staff writer at Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.