Survey: Pennsylvanians among the most tolerant toward neighbors’ yard signs |

Survey: Pennsylvanians among the most tolerant toward neighbors’ yard signs

Stephen Huba
Stephen Huba | Tribune-Review
Rick Saccone signs await distribution at the Westmoreland County Republican headquarters in downtown Greensburg earlier this year.
Stephen Huba | Tribune-Review
Conor Lamb signs await disribution at the Lamb campaign headquarters in downtown Greensburg earlier this year.

Pennsylvanians are among the most tolerant when it comes to their neighbors’ political yard signs, a new survey said.

Pennsylvania ranked 14th out of the states surveyed by ShieldCo, a Maryland-based sign company, about popular attitudes toward political yard signs.

While nearly a third of Americans would be irritated if a neighbor put up a political yard sign, only 26.6 percent of Pennsylvanians found such signs an annoyance, according to the survey.

Created by ShieldCo  â€¢  View larger version

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(e){“FrameHeight”) && (document.getElementById(“data_map_iframe”) + ‘px’)}),document.getElementById(“data_map_iframe”).onload=function(){ document.getElementById(“data_map_iframe”).contentWindow.postMessage(“FrameHeight”,”*”) };

Californians have the biggest issue with yard signs, with 49 percent saying they would be irritated if a neighbor erected one, while Arkansas residents are the most tolerant, with 5.9 percent saying they would be irritated, the survey said.

Rounding out the top three states were West Virginia (7.7 percent) and North Dakota (12.5 percent), according to the survey.

The survey also found that:

• 59.2 percent of Americans are unaware that states have laws regarding the use of political yard signs;

• 59.1 percent believe political yards signs should be allowed only at certain times of the year; and

• 45.4 percent don’t believe that political yards signs have a significant impact on people’s voting choices.

Three thousand people were surveyed.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.