Toomey strengthens lead over McGinty in U.S. Senate race, poll shows |

Toomey strengthens lead over McGinty in U.S. Senate race, poll shows

Tom Fontaine

U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley, has widened his lead over Democratic challenger Katie McGinty in Pennsylvania’s critical Senate race, a poll released Wednesday showed.

The Quinnipiac University Poll said 49 percent of registered voters support Toomey, 40 percent back McGinty, 4 percent do not plan to vote in November and 8 percent are undecided. The poll’s margin of error is 3.2 percent. The results are rounded.

β€œThe GOP’s anxiety over shaky Senate seats appears not to apply to Pennsylvania. Sen. Pat Toomey looks good to go so far,” said Tim Malloy, the poll’s assistant director.

In May, Toomey led by 1 percentage point. That poll showed that 42 percent of Pennsylvania voters had a favorable opinion of Toomey, but nearly one in three voters said they would be less likely to vote for him in November because he wants to push back consideration of Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court until after the election.

The latest poll puts Toomey’s favorability rating at a slightly higher 44 percent, while McGinty’s is 32 percent, up 2 percentage points from May. A higher percentage of voters β€” 39 percent β€” don’t know enough about McGinty to have an opinion of her, the poll said.

In other critical Senate races, failed Republican presidential candidate and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio holds a 7-percentage-point lead over U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy and an 8-point lead over U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson, the two Democratic front-runners in Florida. Republican U.S. Sen. Rob Portman and former Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland are tied in Ohio.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.