Archive

Uber appeals Pennsylvania’s $11M fine | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Uber appeals Pennsylvania’s $11M fine

Aaron Aupperlee

Uber formally appealed this week the $11.3 million fine the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission levied against the San Franscisco-based ride-share company for operating in Allegheny County without a license. The company asked the commission to reopen the case and reconsider the amount of the fine.

Uber had previously offered to settle for $399,000. Lyft, a competitor of Uber, settled for $250,000 for similar violations. The company wrote in an appeal filed Wednesday that the fine was more than five times greater than any fine the commission had ever issued.

Gov. Tom Wolf, county Executive Rich Fitzgerald, Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto and state legislators have asked the PUC to reconsider the fine so as to avoid stymieing innovation in the state. Uber, valued at $51 billion, wrote that paying the fine would have a “crippling effect” on its operations in the state and force the company to divert funding for new and innovative services.

Uber asked the PUC to suspend the fine, which is due June 9, until the appeal process is over.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.