Archive

ShareThis Page
Whistleblower: Penn State ignored frat hazing complaints | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Whistleblower: Penn State ignored frat hazing complaints

The Associated Press
| Monday, June 8, 2015 11:42 a.m
PennStateHazingLawsuitJPEG02b35
James Vivenzio, left, listens to his attorney Aaron J. Frewiald during news conference Monday, June 8, 2015, in Philadelphia. Vivenzio, a former student who blew the whistle on a Penn State fraternity's secret Facebook page featuring photos of naked women says the university ignored his complaints about sexual assault, hazing and drug use.
PennStateHazingLawsuitJPEG0643f
James Vivenzio, left, listens to his attorney Aaron J. Frewiald during news conference Monday, June 8, 2015, in Philadelphia. Vivenzio, a former student who blew the whistle on a Penn State fraternity's secret Facebook page featuring photos of naked women says the university ignored his complaints about sexual assault, hazing and drug use.
PennStateHazingLawsuitJPEG0a10b
James Vivenzio, center, accompanied by his attorney Aaron J. Frewiald, arrives for news conference Monday, June 8, 2015, in Philadelphia. Vivenzio, a former student who blew the whistle on a Penn State fraternity's secret Facebook page featuring photos of naked women, says the university ignored his complaints about sexual assault, hazing and drug use.

PHILADELPHIA — A former student who blew the whistle on a Penn State fraternity’s secret Facebook page featuring photos of naked women said the university ignored his complaints about sexual assault, hazing and drug use.

James Vivenzio of Great Falls, Va., said in a lawsuit filed Monday that he waited eight months for Penn State to take action before going to police in January.

As a freshman pledge, he said, he was burned with cigarettes, force-fed buckets of liquor mixed with urine, vomit and hot sauce and made to guzzle alcohol as part of hazing rituals. He compared his experience at Kappa Delta Rho to being in “a gang” and said he feared someone would end up dead.

“I never intended to become a whistleblower,” Vivenzio, now 21, said Monday at a news conference in Philadelphia. “I was afraid somebody could die unless the abuse, the Facebook 2.0 site, and all that was going on, were shut down.”

Penn State quickly denied the claims filed in the lawsuit, which named the school, the fraternity and others as defendants.

University officials said the school offered “extraordinary assistance” to Vivenzio, including sending an investigator to his home after he left school.

“Neither he nor his family were willing to file a complaint, provide documentation, speak with State College police or participate in pursuing the formal disciplinary process,” the school said.

Penn State recently suspended Kappa Delta Rho for three years. The fraternity’s national office Monday expelled 38 fraternity members, saying they violated the fraternity’s values.

Kappa Delta Rho executive director Joseph Rosenberg, however, said fraternity members who assumed responsibility for their actions would not be expelled.

The fraternity expulsions have no effect on the students’ status at the university. Penn State announced in March that its investigation found some members engaged in sexual harassment that contributed to a “persistent climate of humiliation” for women.

Vivenzio had turned over dozens of texts describing hazing or drug abuse, along with posted photos of men and women, sometimes naked or in sexually suggestive positions, passed out at parties, the lawsuit said.

Amid the hazing, Vivenzio flunked out his freshman year, family lawyer Aaron J. Freiwald said. He returned home during the spring 2013 term, sought treatment for alcohol problems, tried school again last fall and was eventually hospitalized this year for post-traumatic stress. He first complained to the school in April 2014.

An investigator with the school’s Office of Student Conduct visited his Virginia home that month to talk about the allegations. The family said they never heard anything back.

Vivenzio’s parents attended Monday’s news conference but declined to answer questions.

Asked why Vivenzio didn’t simply quit the fraternity, Freiwald said the prevailing “bro culture” on many campuses makes that harder than it sounds.

“There’s a social stigma attached to leaving a fraternity,” Freiwald said.

Freiwald compared the school’s silence to its “painfully slow” response to the Jerry Sandusky sex-abuse scandal.

“I don’t think it’s hard to make the connection to the Sandusky affair here,” he said. “The attitude of keeping this in-house, perhaps looking the other way, certainly being painfully slow to respond, is identical.”

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.