ShareThis Page
Wolf endorses grand jury calls for loosening limits to lawsuits for sexual abuse |

Wolf endorses grand jury calls for loosening limits to lawsuits for sexual abuse

| Friday, August 31, 2018 2:48 p.m
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf

Setting the stage for a battle with state Senate leadership, Gov. Tom Wolf on Friday endorsed legislation that would allow victims of child sexual abuse a two-year window to file civil lawsuits even though statutes of limitation bars them from suing.

Wolf’s recommendation and call for immediate action from lawmakers came as part of his sweeping endorsement for four legislative changes recommended by a statewide grand jury that investigated allegations of child sexual abuse by Catholic priests. In addition to permitting retroactive lawsuits by victims, the grand jury called on the legislature to:

– abolish the criminal and civil statutes of limitations on such crimes;

– clarify the penalties for those failing to report allegations of child sexual abuse; and

– explicitly state that non-disclosure agreements in civil settlements do not bar victims from reporting abuse to law enforcement.

“I implore the House and Senate to send the reforms laid out in the grand jury report to my desk without any hesitation,” Wolf said in a statement.

The Democrat governor said legislative attention is needed for the grand jury report that recounted allegations of “horrifying” clergy sexual abuse of more than 1,000 children and cover-ups in six Catholic diocese, including Pittsburgh and Greensburg.

“Let’s be clear: Many victims were coerced and suppressed from coming forward by an institution they felt obligated to respect,” Wolf said. “The reforms laid out in the grand jury report would deliver what victims deserve.”

His call to action came two days after Senate president pro tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson, said he would not support any measures providing a window of opportunity for retroactive civil suits.

Scarnati said such a law would run counter to the Pennsylvania constitution. Instead, he suggested that Catholic dioceses be permitted to establish a settlement fund for victims.

A limited settlement fund, permitted to exist outside the courts, would not provide justice to victims, Wolf said.

State Rep. Mark Rozzi, D-Berks, an abuse survivor who testified before the grand jury, said he believes he has the votes to push all four of the grand jury’s reforms through the Republican-controlled state House when the Legislature returns Sept. 24.

“This would benefit all survivors of child sexual abuse, not just those abused by priests,” Rozzi said.

He called Wolf’s support huge.

“A victim assistance fund — a settlement fund — would be the cover-up of all cover-ups. It would mean the church would not have to identify the priests,” Rozzi said.

Categories: Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.