Wolf, GOP discuss proposed Pennsylvania budget; no agreement yet |

Wolf, GOP discuss proposed Pennsylvania budget; no agreement yet

HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Wolf and Republican leaders on Tuesday broke bread together.

In the longest budget negotiation during a 21-day stalemate, Wolf, a Democrat, and legislative GOP leaders shared pizza while claiming they made progress. But they reported no breakthroughs and acknowledged they focused only on expenditures. The lawmakers and governor also didn’t agree on how much the state should spend.

The differences dividing them have been revenue-raising proposals such as Wolf’s plan to increase the state income and sales taxes and levy a severance tax on Marcellus shale gas wells. A Republican-drafted budget, which the governor vetoed June 30, did not raise taxes.

“We have a better understanding of where our differences are (on spending),” House Majority Leader David Reed, R-Indiana County, said after the closed-door 3½-hour meeting.

House Speaker Mike Turzai, R-Marshall, called them “productive discussions.”

There was also a more positive atmosphere.

“It was a great chance to sit down and go through where we are right now,” Wolf said.

“Part of this is we trust each other,” he said. It’s also reflective that “we share the same goal of what’s good for Pennsylvania.”

Asked if a stop-gap budget of partial spending is possible in the better-defined areas, Wolf told reporters, “We didn’t even talk about it.”

The budget by law was due on June 30. The $30.1 billion GOP-crafted budget sent to Wolf includes 274 line-item expenditures equal to or greater than Wolf’s proposed spending plan, said House Appropriations Chairman Bill Adolph, R-Delaware County.

But Wolf, marking the first time a governor in modern history has done so, vetoed the entire budget – 401 line items.

The focus of the meeting was on the 127 spending categories where there’s no agreement, Adolph said.

Wolf has proposed a $30 billion-plus budget.

Earlier Tuesday, the tone was different. Wolf warned that bad state budgeting is costing taxpayers about $170 million a year. He told KDKA-AM radio in Pittsburgh that state government is paying a premium of about 1 percent interest on $17 billion in debt.

Wolf and Republican supporters have blasted each other for weeks in home mailers, radio and TV ads, as they spar over the competing budget proposals.

The Associated Press contributed. Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.