Archive

Wolf touts in-home care for seniors | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Wolf touts in-home care for seniors

The Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA — Gov. Tom Wolf said Friday he wants more seniors to obtain health care in their homes instead of in nursing facilities.

In an event at the AARP office in downtown Philadelphia, Wolf told about 30 people that his upcoming 2015-16 state budget plan would expand home- and community-based long-term care for 5,500 people. The Democrat said the proposal would make long-term care for seniors more convenient and personal.

“Seniors have spent their lives working hard to provide for their families,” Wolf said, noting that avoiding nursing-home care for that many people would save taxpayers $162 million a year.

“They’ve worked hard to build their communities, and they should be able to enjoy their golden years in the homes that they built in the communities that they built,” he said.

The state plans to increase the Department of Human Services’ budget by $32 million and add about $7 million to the Department of Aging, Wolf said. The new money would allow the departments to add employees, though Wolf did not say how many would be hired.

Wolf said he wants to make it easier for patients eligible for home health care to have their homes modified to make them more accessible.

AARP said a national study it co-authored last year ranked Pennsylvania 42nd among the states in meeting the long-term care needs of older residents.

“As the state with the nation’s fourth oldest population, we believe expanding home- and community-based programs and assisting family caregivers represents the most cost-efficient use of limited state resources,” said AARP Pennsylvania director Bill Johnston-Walsh.

Wolf is scheduled to release his budget blueprint Tuesday.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.