ShareThis Page
Pentagon: Pakistan ‘humiliated’ |

Pentagon: Pakistan ‘humiliated’

The Associated Press
| Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON — Pakistan has paid dearly for its failure to know or acknowledge that Osama bin Laden was hiding for more than five years in a compound a short distance from a Pakistani military facility, Pentagon leaders insisted on Wednesday.

Pushing back against angry public and congressional accusations that Pakistani officials were complicit in bin Laden’s sanctuary there, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he has seen proof that leaders there were unaware of bin Laden’s whereabouts.

“I have seen no evidence at all that the senior leadership knew. In fact, I’ve seen some evidence to the contrary,” Gates told reporters at the Pentagon. “We have no evidence yet with respect to anybody else. My supposition is somebody knew.”

He would not say who but suggested it could have been retired or low-level Pakistani officials.

The Obama administration is reassessing its fragile and sometimes hostile relationship with Pakistan after the bin Laden killing, which may change the stakes for both sides. For the United States, it might provide greater leverage in its argument to prod Pakistan to go after the militants that target the United States, instead of only those that target Pakistan.

For Pakistan, outrage and shame over what is seen as a breach of national sovereignty will color leaders’ willingness to cooperate with the United States.

Gates and Joint Chiefs chairman Adm. Mike Mullen issued a broad defense of Islamabad’s leadership yesterday. They urged patience as the “humiliated” country worked through the problems emanating from the U.S. clandestine raid deep into Pakistan that killed bin Laden on May 2.

“If I were in Pakistani shoes, I would say I’ve already paid a price. I’ve been humiliated. I’ve been shown that the Americans can come in here and do this with impunity,” Gates said. “I think we have to recognize that they see a cost in that and a price that has been paid.”

That argument, however, may hold no sway on Capitol Hill, which has seen more than $10 billion in aid go to Pakistan over the past 10 years.

If a U.S. aid package to Pakistan came up for a vote in at least one Senate Appropriations subcommittee, “it would not pass at all. I don’t know how I would vote on the issue,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Appropriations subcommittee that oversees foreign aid.

The comments came as the Pakistani Taliban vowed to fight with “new zeal” in the wake of bin Laden’s death to complete the al-Qaida chief’s mission of waging holy war against the West, the deputy commander of the militant group told The Associated Press.

Waliur Rehman’s remarks appeared designed to deflate expectations that bin Laden’s death would slow insurgent groups allied with or inspired by al-Qaida. It also could be an attempt to boost morale among the insurgents who are facing a tough fight against U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Gates and Mullen said the Pakistanis are well-aware of the swelling frustration in Washington. They’ve heard the demands that Islamabad pay a price for its inability or unwillingness to more aggressively target insurgents planning and waging attacks against U.S. and coalition troops across the border in Afghanistan.

“I don’t think we should underestimate the humbling experience that this (has been) and in fact the internal soul searching that’s going on” inside Pakistan’s military, Mullen said.

Mullen has forged a close relationship with his Pakistani counterparts, encouraging them to move against high-level terrorists known to be hiding in Pakistan, including al-Qaida’s No. 2 leader, Ayman al-Zawahri, and kingpins of the Afghan insurgency such as Mullah Omar and Siraj Haqqani.

Pakistan’s continued support is critical for the continued passage of supplies into Afghanistan, as well as its sporadic military operations in some of the insurgent strongholds such as South Waziristan and the Swat Valley.

Mullen said the United States must continue to work with and provide aid to Pakistan. But amid rising anger and distrust of Pakistan across America and on Capitol Hill, both men acknowledged that Islamabad must take concrete action to eliminate the safe havens where militants are hiding along the border with Afghanistan.

In other comments, both Gates and Mullen complained that too much information has been disclosed about the raid by the elite U.S. SEAL team that stormed the compound in Abbottabad and killed bin Laden and four others.

“We are close to jeopardizing this precious capability that we have, and we can’t afford to do that,” said Mullen. “This fight isn’t over.”

He and Gates said that former and current U.S. officials have spilled too many details of the operation, risking the security of the special operations forces involved and their families.

“It’s time to stop talking,” Mullen said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.