Pentagon wants $69M for new Gitmo prison |

Pentagon wants $69M for new Gitmo prison

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The Pentagon’s Southern Command intends to seek $69 million from the Republican-controlled Congress to build a prison for high-value former CIA detainees.

Rear Adm. Kyle Cozad, commander of the detention center, said the command included the proposed appropriation in the fiscal year 2017 portion of its four-your plan for the detention center the president has pledged to close.

The current high-value prison, Camp 7, is a bit of a mystery. Reporters can’t see it, and the public can’t know how much the Bush administration spent to build it for the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks and more than a dozen other high-level terrorists brought here in 2006.

Marine Gen. John Kelly told Congress in February that structural problems on the secret site where it sits on this 45-square-mile base had made it “increasingly unsustainable due to drainage and foundation issues.”

In an interview Friday, Cozad said the maximum-security lockup is safe.

“Quite frankly, there’s no operational issue with that facility today,” he said. “Otherwise, we wouldn’t have folks in there.”

The House Armed Services Committee included the $69 million in its proposed omnibus defense funding bill this year. But the Democrat-led Senate and the Defense department rejected it. The Senate effectively killed funding by proposing a countermeasure requiring the secretary of Defense to certify any new building’s enduring value.

Cozad dismissed a question of whether, since the GOP will take control of the Senate in January, Guantanamo was more likely to get funding for the new prison. That would “purely be speculation,” he said.

If approved for fiscal year 2017, which will start Oct. 1, a building and enclosures for men meant to be held at Guantanamo could be built after President Obama leaves office in January 2017.

About 90 percent of the prison’s 148 captives are held in Camps 5 and 6 — two steel and cement copies of jails in the United States, with cell space for 300.

Cozad said it was not possible to move the 14 or 15 so-called “high-value captives” to a segregated wing or block where the others are held “based on higher level policy,” and because it would not be “space prudent.”

American policy for handling former CIA captives holds them largely incommunicado with a special secret guard force because details of their waterboarding and other treatment overseas at secret sites are still considered classified.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.