ShareThis Page
Perryopolis couple injured in hit-run crash |

Perryopolis couple injured in hit-run crash

| Friday, October 22, 2010 12:00 a.m

A Perryopolis couple was injured Wednesday when their truck went over a guide rail and flipped over on I-70 in Somerset Township.

State police in Washington are now looking for the hit-and-run driver who caused the crash.

Police said Stephen Hela, 65, was traveling west on I-70 between the Kammerer and Dunningsville exits when his Ford Ranger was struck in the front and forced onto the berm of the road and over a guide rail. The truck flipped onto its roof in a grassy area off of the highway.

The hit-and-run vehicle then struck a Kia Sedan operated by Chad A. Slappo, 29, of Donora. His car spun out of control and struck the guide rail several times before coming to rest.

Both drivers said the hit-and run vehicle was “weaving” in and out of traffic when the collisions occurred.

State police in are looking for a silver Dodge Intrepid, which should have red paint on the right passenger side and dark gray paint on the left driver’s side from the collisions.

Hela sustained moderate injuries and was taken to a local hospital by the Bentworth Ambulance Service.

His wife, Georgiana Hela, 67, also sustained moderate injuries but had to be extricated from the truck by firefighters. She was flown from the scene by medical helicopter to a Pittsburgh hospital.

Their conditions weren’t available.

Slappo was not injured.

Fallowfield and Ellsworth firefighters assisted.

Anyone with information is asked to call state police at (724) 223-5200.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.