ShareThis Page
Pharmaceuticals executive Shkreli charged in Ponzi scheme |

Pharmaceuticals executive Shkreli charged in Ponzi scheme

| Thursday, December 17, 2015 11:24 p.m
Martin Shkreli, the former hedge fund manager under fire for buying a pharmaceutical company and ratcheting up the price of a life-saving drug, is escorted by law enforcement agents in New York Thursday, Dec. 17, 2015, after being taken into custody following a securities probe.

NEW YORK — Martin Shkreli is a biotech executive who favors open-collar shirts over lab coats, the founder of a hedge fund who eschewed discretion by broadcasting his life on YouTube, a pill seller who made no bones about his power to raise the price of his medicines.

He struck the very image of a hip young executive who reveled in his ability to shake up the very button-down worlds of high finance and pharmaceuticals.

On Thursday, the 32-year-old live-out-loud agent for the new economy was accused of profiting off a decidedly old-school crime.

Shkreli was arrested on securities fraud charges and unceremoniously marched from his Manhattan home while wearing a gray hoodie and jeans. Federal prosecutors accused him of deceiving investors by covering bad bets at his hedge funds with a series of cash and stock transactions at his biotech firm.

Shkreli “engaged in multiple schemes to ensnare investors through a web of lies and deceit,” U.S. Attorney Robert L. Capers said. “His plots were matched only by efforts to conceal the fraud, which led him to operate his companies … as a Ponzi scheme.”

At his arraignment, Shkreli pleaded not guilty. He tilted his head to the ceiling as the judge said he would be released on a $5 million bond.

Shkreli’s attorneys declined to comment, and the spokesman at his drug company, Turing Pharmaceuticals, did not return emails seeking comment.

The Brooklyn native first stepped into the limelight in the fall when, as head of Turing, he boosted the price of a little-known pill called Daraprim from $13.50 to $750. Daraprim is a 62-year-old drug crucial to treating a severe parasitic infection that afflicts a relatively small but vulnerable patient community: people with compromised immune systems, such as HIV and cancer. The outrage and condemnation was quick, and politicians and presidential candidates seized the moment.

Through it all, Shkreli remained unapologetic. If anything, the attention seemed to prompt him to act even more outrageous, by streaming his life on YouTube for anyone who wanted to tune in and buying the only copy of a Wu-Tang Clan album for $2 million.

At a Forbes Health Care Summit in December, Shkreli was given an opportunity to repent when asked whether he would have done anything differently. There was one thing, he said: “I probably would have raised the price higher.”

Prosecutors alleged the trouble began when Shkreli started a hedge fund, MSMB Capital, in 2009. He raised millions from investors and then made a risky bet that the stock of a small pharmaceutical company would fall. The gamble cost Shkreli and the hedge fund $7 million, according to his indictment.

Instead of acknowledging the loss, he started another hedge fund and raised even more money, law enforcement officials said. He used that fund, MSMB Healthcare, to bail out some of his previous investors and start a new company, Retrophin. He also allegedly continued to lose money — and lie.

Shkreli told potential investors that MSMB Healthcare had a $55 million war chest when it never had more than $6 million, according to the indictment. Some investors were told that he had significantly increased their money when all of their cash had been lost on bad bets or used to bail out other customers.

When investors began to ask for their money back, Shkreli turned to Retrophin, a bio-pharmaceutical company, according to the indictment.

He directed millions in stock and cash from Retrophin toward settling claims with disgruntled investors. He masked some payments under the guise of “consulting contracts,” but never told Retrophin’s board what the money was really for, according to the indictment.

The board removed Shkreli last year, saying it had serious concerns about his conduct and filed suit against its former chief executive.

“Following his departure, the company authorized an independent investigation of Mr. Shkreli’s conduct, publicly disclosed its findings, and has fully cooperated with the government investigations into Mr. Shkreli,” Retrophin said in a statement. Evan Greebel, former outside counsel to Retrophin, was charged Thrusday with helping Shkreli with his fraudulent schemes. Greebel was released on a $1 million bond.

Shkreli’s ouster from Retrophin didn’t dampen his appetite for the pharmaceutical business. He founded yet another company, Turing Pharmaceuticals, earlier this year. He also bought a majority share in KaloBios Pharmaceuticals and was named its chief executive last month.

Shkreli eventually agreed to lower the price to hospitals of Daraprim, the drug that turned him into an Internet meme, but the former hedge fund manager has remained outspoken in the face of intense media scrutiny. After it was revealed that he paid millions for a one-of-a-kind Wu-Tang Clan album, he lashed out at the hip hop group for distancing itself from him. “If I hand you $2 million … show me some respect. At least have the decency to say nothing or ‘no comment,’ “ he said on Twitter. (The FBI said in a tweet that it had not seized the album.)

Shkreli is “fascinating because he’s outrageous and because he taps into deep fears that a lot of people have about the health care system, and specifically about pharma and bio,” said Hank Greely, director of the Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences, noting that while Shkreli’s price hike was egregious, others in the drug industry also raise prices – to a far smaller degree, year after year.

Though Shkreli seemed to take the criticism of Turing’s decision to raise drug prices in stride (“I like to stir the pot, but I would never, ever price a drug beyond a sick person’s reach, he said on Twitter earlier this week), it may be harder to shake off the reputation as a poor investor.

In addition to the criminal charges, in which he could face up to 20 years in prison, the Securities and Exchange Commission has filed civil charges against Shkreli and could bar him from serving on a company board again

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.