ShareThis Page
PIAA releases new sports enrollment figures |

PIAA releases new sports enrollment figures

| Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:00 a.m

The PIAA released new enrollment figures for the next two years in all sports on its website Monday, and some schools will be playing in different football classifications.

Pine-Richland and Peters Township, which have played in Class AAA, have enrollment figures that put them in Class AAAA. Mars, Yough and Southmoreland must move from Class AA to AAA.

Peters Township coach Nick Milchovich said he’s excited about the move.

“We knew our numbers would be up and we knew it was going to be close,” Milchovich said. “We heard a lot of different things and it was kind of a surprise.

“I told the players at the end of the season, we had to get better and maximize our potential. We have to make us the best Peters Township team we can be. I came from Charleroi where we opened the season against Monessen. Now, we have four Monessen (rivalries) on the schedule. Every game is going to be close and there is nothing like playing your neighbor.”

Mt. Pleasant and Keystone Oaks can drop to Class AA, but could elect to stay in Class AAA. Mt. Pleasant coach Mark Lyons said the school administration will decide what is best for the program.

“I’m not sure what we’ll do,” Lyons said. “We’re studying all our options.

Schools have until Dec. 14 to tell the PIAA if they want to play up in classification.

Teams dropping to Class A include Carlynton, Burgettstown and Brentwood. Bishop Canevin and Apollo-Ridge will move from Class A to AA.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.