ShareThis Page
Picking a side isn’t always political. Or is it? |

Picking a side isn’t always political. Or is it?

Penn State quarterback Trace McSorley throws during practice Wednesday in University Park.

Blue and red. Red and blue.

We live in a time and a place where those are colors that can divide people deeply. They can cut across family lines and make for uncomfortable home lives.

And they can really lead to some smack talk at a tailgate.

Oh, wait. Did you think this was about politics? No, no, no. This is about something important. Something that matters in our daily lives.

This is about football.

On Saturday, Penn State’s boys in blue will host the red-clad Ohio State Buckeyes for the annual clash that probably matters more to most Nittany Lion fans than a bowl game.

It’s almost impossible to cheer for one side without condemning the other, even when it comes to close relationships.

In my family, if you went to college, you went to Penn State. We bleed blue and we are unapologetic about it. We wish biblical plagues upon the Buckeyes and would gleefully root for the devil if he was playing against Urban Meyer’s team.

But my mother is a twin. Her stunt double lives in Ohio. Her family is blood red to their marrow. They crow about their team’s victories and championships loud and long, and are just as vociferous in their aspersions against the Lions.

It’s worse for my friend Yvonne. She lives in a home that is happy for 51 weeks of the year. But when she puts on her red jersey and her husband puts on his blue one for the annual battle, all bets are off. They know where their loyalties lie.

We are committed camps and mirrors of each other. We will admit no failing of our own team and find no end of fault with the other side. Every call against us was wrong, a sham, out-and-out proof of conspiracy and double-dealing. Every failure to penalize the other side brings howls of blindness and bribery.

But before the heady bloodlust of battle sets in at kick-off, allow me to make a little confession.

We’re both wrong.

It pains me to my soul to say it, but Ohio State is not inherently evil. Neither is Penn State. Red or blue, both sides are made up of good people and bad people, saints and sinners, but overall, just people trying to do exactly the same things.

They are playing a game, or they are watching the game and celebrating the wins and gnashing their teeth over the losses.

Red or blue, blue or red, everything is the same except which team you love and which team you love to hate. That, and deciding that ultimately, not much matters except what the final score is this time, and either getting even or keeping a streak going for the next time you butt helmets.

Huh. I guess maybe this was about politics after all.

Lori Falce is the Tribune-Review
Community Engagement Editor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.