ShareThis Page
Pirates can expect profits, not wins |

Pirates can expect profits, not wins

| Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:00 a.m

It’s a “natural progression,” new Chairman Bob Nutting said, referring to his taking over the top reins of the Pittsburgh Pirates from Kevin McClatchy, who will be CEO.

The change is no sharp break from the past. The Pirates will keep salaries low by baseball standards while trying to build from within.

As for winning games, however, one hardly sees how staying the course is a “natural progression” for breaking the team’s 14-season losing streak.

But the sports world is no stranger to the unexpected.

We would expect, however, that Mr. Nutting and his father, longtime Pirates investors who own more than 50 percent of the franchise, will operate the Pirates for profit.

The family already benefits from a taxpayer-subsidized stadium and low expectations. Breaking even is the gold standard for the Pirates; doing better is platinum.

Attendance last season was 1.86 million; the National League posted a record average of 2.6 million. Still there is every indication the Pirates are putting enough people in seats to make money.

The Pirates had record attendance of more than 2.44 million in 2001, PNC Park’s first year.

But attendance fell sharply to 1.58 million in 2004, with a two-year uptick in advance of the All-Star Game in 2006.

The bells and whistles of a spanking new field and the All-Star Game will not draw fans; that’s over.

At some point, doing more to win will have to become synonymous with a good business strategy.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.