ShareThis Page
Pirates farm report |

Pirates farm report

| Friday, August 1, 2008 12:00 a.m

Here’s how the Pirates minor league teams fared in their games played Thursday, July 31.

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 52-60) lost, 8-0, at Toledo (Tigers). Starter Mike Thompson (2-2, 5.35) allowed four runs and nine hits in 3 2/3 innings. Jon Van Benschoten allowed three runs and two hits in 1 2/3 innings. Designated hitter Luis Ordaz had three hits, and second baseman Josh Wilson added his 18th double.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 51-60) lost, 1-0, in 10 innings at Trenton (Yankees). In the bottom of the 10th, Trenton’s James Cooper doubled off reliever Ronald Belisario (4-2, 4.85), driving home Joseph Muich for the game winner. Altoona’s only hit was a single by catcher Miguel Perez. Starter Joshua Hill allowed four hits and struck out three in six innings.

LYNCHBURG (High-A, 46-62) played at Myrtle Beach (Braves). The game was suspended due to rain with Lynchburg leading, 6-3.

HICKORY (Low-A, 44-65) lost, 4-0, at Savannah (Mets). Rafael De Los Santos (2-8, 5.29) took the loss. He allowed two runs (one earned) and six hits in 4 2/3 innings. First baseman Matt Hague and left fielder Joe Munoz had two hits each.

STATE COLLEGE (SS-A, 9-31) lost, 8-5, at Batavia (Cardinals). Left fielder Quincy Latimore was 4 for 4, including his eighth double, two RBI and a run scored. Catcher Miguel Mendez added a double and two RBI. Reliever Rudy Owens picked up his fifth loss after giving up four runs and five hits in three innings.

GCL PIRATES (GCL, 21-13) won, 4-2, at home against the Red Sox. Designated hitter Carlos Silva was 1 for 3, including his first homer and two RBI. Ronny Paulino, on rehab assignment since Saturday, was 1 for 3 with an RBI. Winning pitcher Nelson Pereira (2-2, 1.61 ERA) allowed two hits, two runs and struck out four in four innings of relief.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.