ShareThis Page
Pirates farm report |

Pirates farm report

The Tribune-Review
| Saturday, August 5, 2006 12:00 a.m

A look at how the Pirates’ farm teams fared in games played Friday:

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 60-50) lost, 7-2, at Columbus (Yankees). Center fielder Rajai Davis went 3 for 4 and scored a run. Second baseman Craig Stansberry and left fielder Raul Gonzalez each drove in runs for the Indians. Left-hander Sean Burnett (7-8) allowed six runs, but only two earned, on seven hits in four innings.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 63-46) won, 6-4, at home against New Britain (Twins). First baseman Brett Roneberg had two hits, including a two-run triple, and three RBI. Catcher Milver Reyes had a game-high three hits. Right-hander Wardell Starling (4-2) allowed three runs and struck out four in seven innings.

LYNCHBURG (High Single-A, 13-25) won, 4-3, in 10 innings at Kinston (Indians). First baseman Steven Pearce drove in Shaler graduate Dan Schwartzbauer with the game-winning run in the 10th. Pearce collected three hits, including a double, one RBI, and one run scored. Right-handed reliever Derrik Moeves (1-0) pitched a scoreless inning to get the win.

HICKORY (Low Single-A, 21-20 second half) won, 5-3, at home against Charleston (Yankees). Center fielder Andrew McCutchen and right fielder Brad Corley each had two-run homers for the Crawdads. Right-hander Luis Valdez (6-4) got the win, despite allowing two home runs in six innings.

WILLIAMSPORT (Single-A short season, 15-25) won, 3-0, at home against State College (Cardinals). Right-hander Kyle Pearson (2-2) pitched a complete game, allowing two hits and striking out 12. Right fielder Miles Durham drove in a run and scored another. Shortstop Angel R. Gonzalez and first baseman Kent Sakamoto had two hits apiece.

BRADENTON (Rookie, 19-19) had its game at the Gulf Coast League Twins suspended in the bottom of the first inning. The Pirates trailed, 2-0, at the time.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.