ShareThis Page
Pirates farm report |

Pirates farm report

| Saturday, July 8, 2006 12:00 a.m

A look at how the Pirates’ farm teams fared in games played Friday:

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 47-39) lost, 5-1, at home against Toledo (Tigers). Left-hander Oliver Perez (0-2) allowed all five runs, including three home runs, in seven-plus innings. Center fielder Chris Duffy went 3 for 5 with a double and a triple. Catcher Carlos Maldonado had an RBI double and a single.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 50-35) won, 5-4, at Erie (Tigers). Designated hitter Brett Roneberg drove in the game-winning run with a sacrifice fly in the ninth inning. Catcher David Parrish collected three hits and two RBI. Right-hander Franklin Perez (2-0) pitched 1 1/3 scoreless innings of relief for the win.

LYNCHBURG (High Single-A, 3-11 second half) lost, 6-5, at home against Salem (Astros). First baseman Juan Tejeda went 3 for 4 and scored three runs in the loss. Third baseman Michael Carlin, catcher John Suomi and shortstop Dan Schwartzbauer each had two hits and an RBI. Right-hander Derek Hankins (3-7) struck out seven in eight innings but still took the loss.

HICKORY (Low Single-A, 5-11 second half) lost, 13-7, at home against Augusta (Giants). Catcher Christopher Jones went 2 for 2 with three RBI for Hickory. Second baseman Shelby Ford had three hits, an RBI and two runs scored. Right-hander Luis Valdez (3-2) surrendered seven runs, but just two earned, in 2/3 of an inning.

WILLIAMSPORT (Single-A short season, 7-8) won, 4-3, at home against Batavia (Phillies). Catcher A.J. Johnson and right fielder Miles Durham each drove in runs for the Crosscutters. Third baseman Alexander Peralta was the only player to reach base twice (two walks). Right-hander Henry Cabrera (3-0) pitched three hitless relief innings.

BRADENTON (Rookie, 9-6) had its game at the Gulf Coast League Twins postponed.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.