Archive

ShareThis Page
Pirates farm report | TribLIVE.com
News

Pirates farm report

Tribune-Review
| Monday, June 11, 2007 12:00 a.m

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 38-24) lost, 4-3, at Charlotte (White Sox). Shortstop Nick Green was 2 for 5 with two RBI. Right fielder Yurendell DeCaster also had two hits, including a double, and scored a run for the Indians. Right-handed starter Bryan Bullington (9-3) allowed a run in his only inning of work.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 29-30) lost, 12-4, at Harrisburg (Nationals). Third baseman Neil Walker was 2 for 4 with a solo home run. Catcher Milver Reyes was 2 for 3 with a double and a walk. Center fielder Andrew McCutchen hit a double and struck out twice. Right-hander Luis Munoz (6-3) allowed four runs on four hits in 22/3 innings.

LYNCHBURG (High-A, 29-31) won, 3-2, at home against Salem (Astros). Left fielder Ulyses Davenport hit a two-run homer and a solo shot. First baseman Jason Delaney went 2 for 3 with a walk. Right-hander Todd Redmond (5-4) surrendered two runs on five hits in 71/3 innings.

HICKORY (Low-A, 19-28) won, 7-1, at home against Asheville (Rockies). Catcher Francis Poni and second baseman Jim Negrych each drove in two runs for the Crawdads. Shortstop Jose De Los Santos had two hits and scored two runs. Right-hander Jared Hughes (5-4) allowed six hits in seven scoreless innings.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.