ShareThis Page
Pirates farm report |

Pirates farm report

| Sunday, May 23, 2004 12:00 a.m

A look at how the Pirates’ farm teams fared in games played Friday:

NASHVILLE (21-19) won 8-7 at Sacramento (Athletics). C J.R. House hit for the cycle, becoming the second player in Nashville’s 27-year history to accomplish the feat. His homer was the eighth of the season. Dave Williams (2-1) started and won, allowing five runs and eight hits in six innings. He struck out four and walked one. Mark Corey earned his 10th save. CF Rich Thompson, LF Tony Alvarez and SS Shaun Skrehot each had a pair of hits.

ALTOONA (21-19) was rained out at Akron (Indians).

LYNCHBURG (18-22) won 4-1 at Frederick (Orioles). Patrick O’Brien (2-2) started and won, allowing one run and three hits in six innings. He struck out three and walked one. Joshua Higgins earned his eighth save. 1B Brad Eldred was 2 for 5 with a home run (No. 9) and two RBI. 2B Victor Mercedes and SS Taber Lee each had a pair of hits.

HICKORY (24-17) won 5-4 at home against Delmarva (Orioles). Yoann Torrealba (3-2) won in relief of starter Brian Holliday, who allowed four runs and seven hits in six innings. He struck out six and walked two. CF Nyjer Morgan was 3 for 5 with a double, triple and two RBI. 3B Mike Collum had a solo homer (No. 3).

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.