ShareThis Page
Pirates farm report |

Pirates farm report

| Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:00 a.m

How the Pirates’ minor league teams fared Tuesday:

  • Nashville (62-46) lost 5-2 at home against Albuquerque (Marlins). Ryan Vogelsong (10-7) started and lost, allowing two runs on six hits in four innings. He walked one and struck out five. CF Tony Alvarez went 2 for 4 with a double. RF J.J. Davis hit a solo homer (No. 21).

  • Altoona (60-47) lost 7-4 at home against New Britain (Twins). John VanBenschoten (5-2) started and lost, allowing six runs on 10 hits in five innings. He walked three and struck out three. RF Shawn Garrett went 3 for 4, including a double and a solo homer (No. 13). CF Chris Duffy went 2 for 4. 2B Jose Castillo hit a solo homer (No. 5).

  • Lynchburg (54-46) was rained out at Winston-Salem (White Sox).

  • Hickory (66-39) lost 5-3 at Delmarva (Orioles). Zach Duke (7-5) started and lost, allowing five runs on eight hits in six innings. DH Chris Bass went 3 for 4 with a triple. 1B Brad Eldred went 2 for 3 with a homer (No. 19) and two RBI. CF Rajai Davis had two hits.

  • Williamsport (26-14) had the day off.

  • Bradenton (21-14) lost 10-5 against the Yankees. David Davidson (0-2) lost in relief of starter Wardell Starling, who allowed two runs on five hits in six innings. 1B Mike Carlin went 3 for 5 with a triple and two RBI. C Francis Poni went 2 for 4 with an RBI.

    is a former freelancer.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.