ShareThis Page
Pirates lose, 5-1 |

Pirates lose, 5-1

| Friday, September 19, 2008 12:00 a.m

The Pirates managed only four hits and went quietly in a 5-1 loss Friday night at PNC Park to start the final homestand of the year.

It was the Astros’ first victory in six games since being displaced by the Category 3 hurricane that slammed into southwest Texas one week ago.

Since then, the Astros were no-hit, one-hit and amassed five runs in five games.

Randy Wolf (5-2) continued his dominance of the Pirates, The 32-year-old left-hander allowed one run on three hits over seven innings. Wolf, on the wrong end of Carlos Zambrano’s no-hitter earlier this week, struck out seven and walked one to improve to 7-1 against the Pirates in 10 career starts.

Latroy Hawkins and Tim Byrdak, Jose Valverde finished it off for the Astros.

The Pirates’ only hits were a single by Nate McLouth in the first inning, Adam LaRoche’s solo home run and Steve Pearce’s single to center, both in the fourth, and LaRoche’s two-out single in the ninth.

Wolf used a repertoire of off-speed pitches, including a curveball that sometimes stayed in the high 60s-low 70s, to keep the Pirates off-balance.

Ian Snell (6-12) struggled with his control, walking five. He allowed one earned run in six innings on three hits.

The Pirates fell to 64-90, giving them their fourth consecutive 90-loss season. Only the 1950-55 Pirates have more 90-loss seasons in a row (six).

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.