ShareThis Page
Pitt AD to talk extension with women’s coach |

Pitt AD to talk extension with women’s coach

JoAnne Klimovich Harrop
| Wednesday, March 29, 2006 12:00 a.m

Pitt athletic director Jeff Long will likely meet with women’s basketball coach, Agnus Berenato, soon to discuss a possible contract extension.

“We are certainly pleased with what she has done, and not just in the win/loss column,” Long said. “Agnus has had such a huge impact on these young women. She teaches them more than Xs and Os.

“What this team has done this season is not totally unexpected, because Agnus is the type of person who does everything right, from the little things to the big things. She gets her players to believe.”

Berenato, who agreed to a seven-year deal, just finished her third season with the Panthers, leading them to the WNIT semifinals. Pitt finished with 22 wins this past season, tying the school record.

Berenato came to Pitt after 17 seasons at Georgia Tech — 15 as head coach.

Her name has been mentioned for several Division I coaching vacancies.

“I am very happy at the University of Pittsburgh,” she said. “My husband and my kids love it here. I feel like I have the best staff and a great team. We all get along, and that is what has made this work.

“I believe we can get Pittsburgh to be a nationally recognized program.”

JoAnne Klimovich Harrop is a Tribune-Review fashion writer. You can contact JoAnne at 412-320-7889, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.