ShareThis Page
Pitt beats Louisville in Big East tourney |

Pitt beats Louisville in Big East tourney

| Wednesday, May 25, 2011 12:00 a.m

CLEARWATER, Fla. — In the scramble for a 10 a.m. first pitch Wednesday, Pitt catcher Kevan Smith couldn’t find his pants or cleats. So, he found a larger pair of pants, wearing them high on his hips, and borrowed a pitcher’s cleats, smaller than his own.

He’ll wear the same uncomfortable ensemble today after he hit two solo home runs yesterday to spark third-seeded Pitt to a 7-2 win over sixth-seeded Louisville in the first round at Bright House Field.

“I didn’t feel comfortable today. It was all out of whack,” said Smith, who was trying to leg out a double in the first inning when the umpire ruled his shot to left field was a homer. “I’ll wear the same stuff. Ballplayers are superstitious. But my feet are killing me.”

Home run trots can help ease that — he and David Chester hit solo shots on consecutive pitches in the third inning, his 10th and Chester’s Big East-best 15th of the season.

Louisville starter Derek Self (3-3) hadn’t allowed a home run this season in 472/3 innings against Big East teams. Then again, he hadn’t faced Pitt (33-21).

“I feel like this team is built for a tournament team. We’re finally starting to click in the lineup, and you can kind of see we went off a little bit,” Smith said. “Their pitcher Self is a great pitcher, had a 1-point-something ERA, and we kind of got to him. That boosts our confidence as a team, gives us confidence that we can win this thing.”

The home runs staked lefty Matt Iannazzo (8-3) to a 4-0 lead after three innings, and he helped the Panthers by going the distance, taking a shutout into the eighth inning against the Cardinals (29-28). He’ll be available to go again in Sunday’s championship game, should the Panthers keep winning.

“I couldn’t have done it without my defense. I think I had only four strikeouts,” said Iannazzo, who got five assists each from third baseman Phil Konieczny and shortstop Evan Oswald. “My left side of my defense played really well.”

Pitt has momentum and fresh arms entering today’s game against second-seeded St. John’s, an 8-3 winner over No. 7 seed Cincinnati. St. John’s (33-18) swept Pitt in three games this season.

Panther coach Joe Jordano said he’ll start a right-hander Thursday — either senior Corey Baker (5-3, 5.14 ERA) or freshman Ethan Mildren (4-5, 4.19).

No. 5 Seton Hall 10, No. 4 West Virginia 4 — The Mountaineers gave up eight runs combined in the first three innings and lost in the first round.

Matt Malloy, Chris Rasky, Dan Dibartolomeo, Brady Wilson and Mark Dvoroznak each had two hits for West Virginia.

Mountaineers starter Marshall Thompson allowed fours run and three hits in 12/3 innings.

West Virginia will face either No. 1 seed Connecticut or No. 8 Notre Dame in the second round.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.