Archive

ShareThis Page
Pitt chancellor responds to sexual harassment, discrimination allegations against communication department | TribLIVE.com
News

Pitt chancellor responds to sexual harassment, discrimination allegations against communication department

Jamie Martines
| Wednesday, December 20, 2017 11:36 a.m
gtrPitt1122017
Thomas Altany
gtrPitt1122017
Thomas Altany
ptrlomoon02111516
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
The nearly full moon rises above the Cathedral of Learning at the University of Pitsburgh in Oakland on Monday, Nov. 14, 2016.
ptrlomoon02111516
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
The nearly full moon rises above the Cathedral of Learning at the University of Pitsburgh in Oakland on Monday, Nov. 14, 2016.

University of Pittsburgh Chancellor Patrick Gallagher issued a letter to the Pitt community Wednesday in response to recent allegations of a long-standing culture of sexual harassment and discrimination in the Department of Communication.

“First and foremost: Our top priority and concern is the safety, security and well-being of our students and our employees,” the letter said. “Discrimination and harassment of any kind are wholly unacceptable and run contrary to our academic mission and our values as an institution. We are working to ensure that the current culture within our Department of Communication is free from discrimination and harassment.”

The letter goes on to say that the Title IX Office is leading an investigation of the Department of Communication. In addition, Pitt will initiate an external review of the department. Gallagher notes that some of the claims date back more than 10 years.

The letter is available in full on the Pitt website.

Former professor Carol Stabile, who worked in the Communications and Women’s Studies departments from 1994 to 2005, published an essay to the site Ms. Magazine on Dec. 13. In it, she details what she describes as “a climate that was hostile to women and people of color” in the Communications Department.

She described an atmosphere where colleagues regularly made sexual comments and discussed their sexual interest in students. Stabile also shared anecdotes from graduate students who had been pursued by professors promising favors or job offers.

Stabile said she has met several people — including former students or staff in the department — who had similar experiences since she left the department in 2005, which motivated her to write the essay. Stabile currently serves as the chair of the Department of Women’s Studies at the University of Maryland.

Pitt spokesman Joe Miksch confirmed Tuesday that the Title IX investigation was initiated by Stabile’s essay.

This isn’t the first time Pitt has investigated the Department of Communication. An internal investigation into faculty relationships with students was conducted in 2004, concluding that while there was evidence of relationships between senior faculty and students, the department was healthy, according to 2004 reports by The Pitt News, the student newspaper.

The university updated a policy on student-faculty relationships in March 2017. It states that faculty and staff members are not permitted to engage in relationships with students they supervise directly. This policy applies to advisers, coaches, graduate student teaching assistants and members of a department’s thesis and graduate committees, among other positions.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at jmartines@ tribweb.com, 724-850 -2867 or vi a Twitter @Jamie _Martines.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, jmartines@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.