ShareThis Page
Pitt, CMU to train brain researchers |

Pitt, CMU to train brain researchers

| Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:00 a.m

Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh announced Tuesday that they have partnered in a joint federal program to provide interdisciplinary training in neuroscience.

With $7 million in grants from the National Institute of Drug Abuse and the National Science Foundation, the universities will train undergraduate and graduate students in several aspects of neuroscience.

The plan is to create a generation of brain researchers who can explore multiple fields of neuroscience in the quest to understand how people think and learn.

“We are moving into a new era of multidisciplinary training in which we are asking our students to stretch intellectually,” said Peter Strick, professor of neurobiology and psychiatry at Pitt’s School of Medicine and co-director of the new Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition.

“The result is a new generation of multidisciplinary neuroscientists who are comfortable asking complex questions and then using the most appropriate approaches to solve them.”

The program includes Carnegie Mellon faculty in the departments of biological sciences, computer science, psychology, robotics and statistics, and Pitt faculty in bioengineering, mathematics, neurobiology, neurology, neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.