ShareThis Page
Pitt dismisses first-round fears |

Pitt dismisses first-round fears

Pitt might not know much about NCAA first-round opponent Oral Roberts, but eye rolls were on cue when talk of four-in-four turned to one-and-done.

Faster than you can say Syracuse, the Panthers distanced themselves from the only other team to win four Big East tourney games in as many days at Madison Square Garden.

That’s because the fifth-seeded Orange promptly lost to No. 12 Texas A&M in the first round of the 2006 NCAA Tournament. Pitt has no plans to repeat that feat.

“I’ve heard it a thousand times,” Pitt freshman center DeJuan Blair said, “and every time I heard it I said, ‘We’re not Syracuse.’ They probably just wanted to win the Big East. We’re looking for the national championship. Well, I’m looking for it. I’ve been in championships all my life. We have to stay hungry. The Big East, that is something we should have won. We just have to keep reaching.”

Fourth-seeded Pitt (26-9) hopes to ride its Big East momentum when it plays No. 13 seed Oral Roberts (24-8) Thursday at Pepsi Center in Denver.

“The four games in four days never really became an issue for us. It’s not like you have an option,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “We have to play our best basketball on Thursday. We know we are playing a good team that is used to winning. It’s a one-and-done tournament. We played well this past week, but that doesn’t get you any points on Thursday.”

Since 1996-97, nine teams had won four games in four days to claim their conference tourney titles. Pitt and Southeastern Conference champion Georgia did the same this year, but their predecessors met a mixed fate.

Where Xavier won the Atlantic-10 and reached the Elite Eight in 2004, Arkansas and St. Louis (both in 2000) joined Syracuse (’06) as first-round flops, while Iowa bowed out in the second in 2001. After following in Syracuse’s footsteps once, the Panthers have no intentions of doing it again.

“You can’t really compare our team with that Syracuse team,” Pitt senior guard Ronald Ramon said. “We’re two completely different teams, two completely different situations. We have to stay focused on the things we’ve been doing, especially with the way we’ve played the past few days. The confidence level is high, knowing that if we stay focused and we do the things we have to do we can win games against anybody in the country.

“We’ve got to keep it going, keep the same intensity and same mentality when we go out there and play basketball.”

Additional Information:

NCAA men’s bracket

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.