Archive

Pitt lands Aliquippa wide receiver Will Gipson, its first WPIAL commitment | TribLIVE.com
News

Pitt lands Aliquippa wide receiver Will Gipson, its first WPIAL commitment

Jerry DiPaola
493517PTRAliquippaBF08092218
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Aliquippa’s William Gipson scores during the second quarter against Beaver Falls Friday, Sept. 21, 2018, at Geneva College.

Pitt finally broke through with its first verbal commitment from the WPIAL’s class of 2019 on Thursday night when Aliquippa wide receiver Will Gipson announced his plans to enroll.

Gipson, a three-star recruit, is the 16 th overall prospect in the state, fourth from the WPIAL, according to Rivals.com. He is also ranked the No. 2 wide receiver in Pennsylvania, behind only Imhotep Charter School’s Yusef Terry, who is committed to Baylor.

He represents Pitt’s 19 th verbal commitment and the second wide receiver in its class, joining Jared Wayne of Clearwater, Fla.

Gipson, 6-foot-3, 190 pounds, had been committed to Ball State — with teammate Solvauhn Moreland — since June, but he re-opened his recruitment Nov. 19, two days after leading Aliquippa to a WPIAL championship.

“I wanted to stay close to home,” Gipson said. “It’s the best school for me. Pitt showed me the most love when I went on a visit.”

He also had scholarship offers from Rutgers, Howard, Toledo and Miami (Ohio). He said he visited Toledo four times.

Gipson caught seven passes for 165 yards against Derry in the title game two weeks ago, giving him 53 receptions for 1,494 yards and 18 touchdowns for the season.

Aliquippa meets Sharon on Saturday in a PIAA semifinal game at Slippery Rock University.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.