ShareThis Page
Pitt lands juco tackle |

Pitt lands juco tackle

Kevin Gorman
| Thursday, December 8, 2005 12:00 a.m

Pitt addressed one of its most glaring concerns in a big way Wednesday, when the Panthers received a verbal commitment from a junior-college offensive tackle.

Jeff Otah, a 6-foot-7, 340-pounder from Valley Forge Military Academy’s junior-college program, picked Pitt over Maryland, Michigan State, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Otah, who played at William Penn High in New Castle, Del., will enter Pitt as a junior and have two years of eligibility. He could replace second-team All-Big East selection Charles Spencer at left tackle.

Otah is Pitt’s 20th recruit — and third offensive lineman — from the Class of 2006. considers Otah a four-star prospect and ranks him the No. 26 offensive lineman in the nation. He joins Joe Thomas, a 6-4, 294-pounder from Lakewood (Ohio) St. Edward who is ranked No. 20, and Kennedy Catholic guard Eric Rodemoyer (6-3, 309).

Valley Forge ran the majority of its plays behind Otah, who runs the 40-yard dash in 5.2 seconds.

“He’s a big kid who can move,” recruiting analyst Bob Lichtenfels said. “He’s got a great wing span, a great frame. He can run block and he pass-blocks tremendously. With him and Joe Thomas, they have two four-star recruits on the offensive line.”

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review sports columnist. You can contact Kevin by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.