Pitt named Pennsylvania’s top value school |

Pitt named Pennsylvania’s top value school

Deb Erdley
University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning
University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning

Who says 13 isn’t a lucky number?

Officials at the University of Pittsburgh certainly aren’t complaining about being ranked as the top value among all public colleges and universities in Pennsylvania for the 13th consecutive year on Kiplinger’s Personal Finance list of 100 best value public colleges in the U.S.

While Pitt and Penn State typically rank among the priciest public flagships universities in the nation, Kiplinger’s gave Pitt its seal of approval after weighing the university’s sticker price, financial aid packages, admission rate, four-year graduation rate and the average student debt at graduation, among other factors.

Pitt officials noted that the Oakland-based school made the cut for the top 100 schools nationwide from a list of 1,200 colleges and universities the magazine considered.

Pitt Chancellor Patrick Gallagher said the ranking reflects Pitt’s commitment to “providing a world-class education at an exceptional value.”

Other Pennsylvania public colleges that made the top 100 public university list included Penn State and Temple.

The top 100 public college rankings will be included in the Febuary 2018 edition of Kiplinger’s Personal Finance.

Debra Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-320-7996, [email protected] or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.