ShareThis Page
Pitt notebook |

Pitt notebook

| Monday, December 4, 2006 12:00 a.m

Pitt survived its worst free-throw shooting effort of the season, going 10 for 19. The Panthers, who entered the game shooting 72.2 percent from the line, missed six in a row during one stretch late in the game.

“Obviously, we would have liked to made some free throws down the stretch, but we have very good free throw shooters, and I expect them to make them down the road,” coach Jamie Dixon said.

&#149 The Panthers helped Auburn draw by far its largest home crowd of the season, as 6,544 looked on. Auburn had attracted an average home attendance of 3,160 in its first four games at the Beard-Eaves Memorial Colisuem. The arena seats 10,500.

&#149 Pitt turned the ball over a season-high 18 times. Guard Levance Fields had three turnovers to go with three assists. Fields also had a career-best eight rebounds. Pitt had a season-high 46 rebounds.

&#149 Pitt remains undefeated in December under Dixon, improving to 24-0. The Panthers also moved to 6-0 against SEC teams under Dixon. The Panthers will play host to Duquesne on Wednesday in the annual City Game.

&#149 Sophomore small forward Sam Young, bothered by a nagging knee injury, played a season-low five minutes. Dixon also said forward Tyrell Biggs had a pregame temperature of 100 degrees, and center Aaron Gray missed practice Saturday with a blister on his left foot.


23 – Double-doubles for Aaron Gray in his past 41 games.

4 – Career double-doubles for everybody on Pitt’s roster other than Gray (Young 2, Mike Cook, Levon Kendall).

– John Grupp

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.