ShareThis Page
Pitt player scored one against intolerance |

Pitt player scored one against intolerance

| Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:00 a.m

To say Bob Grier made friends easily while attending the University of Pittsburgh would be an understatement.

Grier, who graduated from the Oakland campus in 1956, was a well-liked member of Pitt’s football squad at the time, which partially explains his popularity.

But when the team was selected to play in the Sugar Bowl, a previously segregated game, Grier’s likability and winning personality managed to break down one of the last remaining color barriers in college sports.

Now retired and living in Pine, Grier, 72, smiled easily when asked about that game.

“The game came one day after Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the bus in Montgomery (Ala.), but I never thought my playing in that game was any kind of big civil rights gesture,” Grier said. “I just played because my teammates supported me and wanted me to play.”

Though college and professional football today are as integrated as any big city, the gridiron wasn’t always that way. Grier was the only black player on Pitt’s team that season, and only a few northern universities fielded integrated football squads.

It was an unwritten rule that all-white football teams from southern schools would not risk being defeated by teams with black players, which is probably what Georgia Gov. Marvin Griffin feared when Pitt took on Georgia Tech in the Sugar Bowl.

Before the game, Griffin issued a public statement as ill-informed and bizarre as the institution of segregation itself, claiming “the South stood at Armageddon,” and swearing to not “make the slightest concession to the enemy in this dark and lamentable hour of need.”

Grier’s white teammates had already gone on record supporting their teammate, promising to skip the Sugar Bowl appearance altogether if Grier, a star fullback and linebacker, could not play.

And in one of the more inspiring and unexpected moments of the whole civil rights era, Grier watched as thousands of white students at Georgia Tech took up his cause. In the days before the game, they staged protest marches in support of Grier, burning Griffin in effigy and at one point nearly storming his residence before being turned away by Georgia National Guardsmen.

“It was incredible to see all this support and when we finally went down to play, the white players from Georgia Tech let me stay with them because the hotels where the visiting teams stayed didn’t allow blacks. I’ll never forget how nice people were to me,” said Grier, who served in the Air Force before returning to Pittsburgh in 1966.

Though Pitt lost the 1956 Sugar Bowl because of a controversial pass interference call against Grier, a look at any college football roster today shows that it was Grier and his teammates who really won that day.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.