Pitt student might also fail to make the grade in court |

Pitt student might also fail to make the grade in court

Pop quiz time, folks, but don't worry. It's just one multiple-choice question.

When University of Pittsburgh student Emir Yazici recently failed a psychology course, he reacted like most undergraduates would by:

a) Shrugging ambivalently and playing video games.

b) Drowning his sorrows at a bar for a night and moving on with life.

c) Resolving to try harder academically and re-take the course.

d) Suing the instructor in an attempt to get the grade changed.

If you answered “d,” go to the head of the class, where running into Yazici won't be a risk.

Yazici filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh against Katrina Cooper D'Aquin for not giving him the passing grade he needed last semester to graduate with dual degrees in information sciences and psychology. He is seeking a better grade or $2,500 from D'Aquin so he can take another class and finally get his diploma.

“I had to do it,” Yazici, 22, of Mt. Lebanon insisted on Tuesday. “I went through the psychology department, (the school of) Arts and Sciences, Academic Affairs I think. I tried to make an appointment with the provost. Everyone kept telling me they couldn't do anything about the grade.”

Did they provide a reason as to why?

“They all said we're not able to give any kind of judgment on a teacher's grading,” Yazici said. “I told them, ‘Fine, I will be a teacher one day, and I will teach your children, and I will fail them, and you won't be able to do anything about it.' ”

Pitt Provost and Senior Vice Chancellor Patricia Beeson probably erroneously assumed that Yazici was just an egotistical, self-aggrandizing whiner. She probably mistakenly thought he had the same absurd sense of entitlement and aversion to personal responsibility as many other members of his generation who were raised to believe they are incapable of failure.

Bet she regrets not providing him with an opportunity to present his case before it entered the legal system.

D'Aquin didn't return my call on Tuesday to address the lawsuit's allegations that she “has a history of unfair grading, disrespecting men, not responding in a timely manner, along with calling off her class for so-called medical reasons which we need proof of.”

If that evidence isn't damning enough, Yazici noted that D'Aquin has received several unfavorable reviews on the website, where students critique instructors. That they do so anonymously only bolsters the veracity of their claims.

The lawsuit asserts that D'Aquin claimed that a paper Yazici turned in “had many spelling and grammar error (sic), which I found it hard to believe.”

Even harder to believe is that Yazici prepared this well-reasoned legal brief without any assistance whatsoever.

No wonder he can't wait to get before a judge and jury.

“I think I'm going to win,” he said confidently.

With a case this strong, how could he fail?

Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7857 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.