ShareThis Page
Pitt upset by Bradley |

Pitt upset by Bradley

The Associated Press
| Sunday, March 19, 2006 12:00 a.m

AUBURN HILLS, Mich. – They’re partying in Peoria! Bradley is in the third round of the NCAA tournament for the first time in 41 years.

Patrick O’Bryant dominated Aaron Gray in a matchup of 7-footers, getting 28 points and seven rebounds to lead 13th-seeded Bradley to a 72-66 victory over fifth-seeded Pittsburgh on Sunday in the second round of the Oakland Regional.

Marcellus Sommerville added 18 points for the Braves (22-10), who join fellow Missouri Valley Conference member Wichita State in the round of 16. They will play the winner of top-seeded Memphis and ninth-seeded Bucknell in Oakland, Calif., on Thursday.

Playing in their first NCAA tournament in 10 years, the Braves have looked like seasoned veterans with surprising wins over fourth-seeded Kansas and now the Panthers (25-8), becoming the first No. 13 seed in the regional semifinals since Oklahoma in 1999.

They didn’t wait to make the six-hour trip back home to Illinois to start celebrating.

As the horn sounded, the Bradley players leaped over the scorer’s table and joined thousands of red-clad Braves faithful in the stands.

O’Bryant, a sophomore from Blaine, Minn., led the way after rendering Pitt’s 7-footer a non-factor on Sunday, getting Gray in early foul trouble with his quickness and then simply outplaying him in the second half.

After dominating the smaller Kent State in the first round with 17 points and 13 rebounds, Gray had to look eye-to-eye with O’Bryant in this one, and couldn’t measure up, scoring 12 points.

Pittsburgh senior Carl Krauser scored 17 points to lead Pitt, which was playing in its school-record fifth straight NCAA tournament, but looked like nervous kids against the newcomers from Bradley.

Krauser said before the tourney started he was looking forward to a possible rematch with former Pitt coach Ben Howland and UCLA in the regional final.

But that will be for Bradley to dream about now.

There were only 24 teams in the tournament the last time Bradley advanced to the third round in 1955. They lost to Colorado that year, ending the school’s bid for three title-game appearances in five years. Additional Information:

Bradley 72, Pittsburgh 66

BRADLEY (22-10)

Sommerville 5-14 7-8 18, O’Bryant 10-17 8-9 28, Bennett 1-7 0-2 2, Tauai 0-0 0-0 0, Ruffin 0-3 4-4 4, Franklin 1-4 1-2 4, Andrews 1-3 0-0 2, Wright 4-11 6-7 14, Adams 0-0 0-0 0. Totals 22-59 26-32 72.


Kendall 2-2 1-2 5, Gray 5-11 2-2 12, Ramon 3-9 0-0 8, Krauser 6-13 4-4 17, Graves 0-8 0-0 0, DeGroat 0-0 0-0 0, Fields 6-10 3-3 18, Hudson 0-0 0-0 0, Young 3-8 0-0 6. Totals 25-61 10-11 66.

Halftime ?Bradley 30-29. 3-Point Goals ?Bradley 2-6 (Franklin 1-1, Sommerville 1-2, Ruffin 0-1, Bennett 0-2), Pittsburgh 6-20 (Fields 3-4, Ramon 2-4, Krauser 1-6, Young 0-2, Graves 0-4). Fouled Out ?None. Rebounds? Bradley 40 (Wright 9), Pittsburgh 38 (Kendall, Krauser 6). Assists ?Bradley 14 (Ruffin 4), Pittsburgh 11 (Krauser 5). Total Fouls ?Bradley 16, Pittsburgh 23. A ?NA.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.